Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Hajibandeh, Shahab [1 ,7 ]
Kotb, Ahmed [2 ]
Evans, Louis [3 ]
Sams, Emily [3 ]
Naguib, Andrew [4 ]
Hajibandeh, Shahin [5 ]
Satyadas, Thomas [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff Liver Unit, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Glan Clwyd Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Rhyl, England
[3] Cwm Taf Univ Hlth Board, Royal Glamorgan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Pontyclun, England
[4] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Undergraduate Dept, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg & Liver Transplant U, Birmingham, England
[6] Manchester Royal Infirm Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Manchester, England
[7] Univ Hosp Wales, Cardiff Liver Unit, Heath Pk Way, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
关键词
Laparoscopy; Caudate lobe; Liver resection; Hepatectomy; OPEN LIVER RESECTION; POSTEROSUPERIOR;
D O I
10.14701/ahbps.22-045
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181-269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85-184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5-9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%-5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%-19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 19
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Bin
    Peng, Yufu
    Yang, Wugui
    Yang, Yubo
    Li, Bo
    Wei, Yonggang
    Liu, Fei
    HPB, 2024, 26 (09) : 1089 - 1102
  • [32] Medial Versus Lateral Approach in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ding, Jie
    Liao, Guo-qing
    Xia, Yu
    Zhang, Zhong-min
    Pan, Yang
    Liu, Sheng
    Zhang, Yi
    Yan, Zhong-shu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (04) : 863 - 872
  • [33] Anatomic Laparoscopic Liver Resection in the Scenario of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Bocchino, Antonio
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (10): : 1076 - 1081
  • [34] Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng Xiangfei
    Xu Yinzhe
    Pan Yingwei
    Lu Shichun
    Duan Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (08): : 2396 - 2418
  • [35] Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meng Xiangfei
    Xu Yinzhe
    Pan Yingwei
    Lu Shichun
    Duan Weidong
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2396 - 2418
  • [36] Comparing laparoscopic and open resection in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoo, Jeong-Ju
    Park, Dong Ah
    Ryoo, Seungeun
    Park, Jungeun
    Choi, Gi Hong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (03) : 1153 - 1164
  • [37] Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques in Cirrhosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
    Saurabh Chandan
    Smit Deliwala
    Shahab R. Khan
    Daryl Ramai
    Babu P. Mohan
    Mohammad Bilal
    Antonio Facciorusso
    Lena L. Kassab
    Faisal Kamal
    Banreet Dhindsa
    Abhilash Perisetti
    Douglas G. Adler
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2022, 67 : 4813 - 4826
  • [38] Medial Versus Lateral Approach in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jie Ding
    Guo-qing Liao
    Yu Xia
    Zhong-min Zhang
    Yang Pan
    Sheng Liu
    Yi Zhang
    Zhong-shu Yan
    World Journal of Surgery, 2013, 37 : 863 - 872
  • [39] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Sutandi, Nathania
    Robinson, Stuart R.
    French, Jeremy J.
    White, Steven A.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (09) : 1107 - 1118
  • [40] Outcomes of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Sijie
    Fan, Ruohao
    Zhang, Hua
    Jiang, Weihong
    Xie, Zhihai
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 88 (05) : S19 - S31