Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Hajibandeh, Shahab [1 ,7 ]
Kotb, Ahmed [2 ]
Evans, Louis [3 ]
Sams, Emily [3 ]
Naguib, Andrew [4 ]
Hajibandeh, Shahin [5 ]
Satyadas, Thomas [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff Liver Unit, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Glan Clwyd Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Rhyl, England
[3] Cwm Taf Univ Hlth Board, Royal Glamorgan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Pontyclun, England
[4] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Undergraduate Dept, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg & Liver Transplant U, Birmingham, England
[6] Manchester Royal Infirm Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Manchester, England
[7] Univ Hosp Wales, Cardiff Liver Unit, Heath Pk Way, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
关键词
Laparoscopy; Caudate lobe; Liver resection; Hepatectomy; OPEN LIVER RESECTION; POSTEROSUPERIOR;
D O I
10.14701/ahbps.22-045
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181-269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85-184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5-9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%-5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%-19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 19
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Procedural outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobe resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anwer, Amal Azhar
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Kotb, Ahmed
    Evans, Louis
    Sams, Emily
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Satyadas, Thomas
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [2] Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis
    Zigang Ding
    Lingpeng Liu
    Bangran Xu
    Yong Huang
    Hu Xiong
    Dilai Luo
    Mingwen Huang
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 1307 - 1316
  • [3] Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis
    Ding, Zigang
    Liu, Lingpeng
    Xu, Bangran
    Huang, Yong
    Xiong, Hu
    Luo, Dilai
    Huang, Mingwen
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) : 1307 - 1316
  • [4] Does Caudate Resection Improve Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gilbert, Richard W. D.
    Lenet, Tori
    Cleary, Sean P.
    Smoot, Rory
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    Rocha, Flavio G.
    Martel, Guillaume
    Bertens, Kimberly A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (11) : 6759 - 6771
  • [5] Does Caudate Resection Improve Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Richard W. D. Gilbert
    Tori Lenet
    Sean P. Cleary
    Rory Smoot
    Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
    Flavio G. Rocha
    Guillaume Martel
    Kimberly A. Bertens
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 6759 - 6771
  • [6] Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic Liver Resection of Caudate Lobe: A Systematic Review
    Millan, Gabriela Del Angel
    Cassese, Gianluca
    Giannone, Fabio
    Del Basso, Celeste
    Alagia, Mariantonietta
    Lodin, Marco
    Monsellato, Igor
    Palucci, Marco
    Sangiuolo, Federico
    Panaro, Fabrizio
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (01):
  • [7] ENDOSCOPIST PROCEDURAL VOLUME AND COLONOSCOPY OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Forbes, Nauzer
    Boyne, Devon
    Mazurek, Matthew S.
    Hilsden, Robert
    Sutherland, Robert L.
    Pader, Joy
    Ruan, Yibing
    Shaheen, Abdel Aziz
    Wong, Clarence K.
    Lamidi, Mubasiru
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    Brenner, Darren R.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB281 - AB282
  • [8] Isolated Laparoscopic Caudate Lobe Resection
    Kyriakides, Charis
    Panagiotopoulos, Nikolaos
    Jiao, Long R.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (04): : E209 - E209
  • [9] Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection
    Maulik Parikh
    Ho-Seong Han
    Jai Young Cho
    Mizelle D’Silva
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [10] Laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Notarnicola, Margherita
    Felli, Emanuele
    Roselli, Stefania
    Altomare, Donato Francesco
    De Fazio, Michele
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Piardi, Tullio
    Acquafredda, Silvana
    Ammendola, Michele
    Verbo, Alessandro
    Pessaux, Patrick
    Memeo, Riccardo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (09): : 2763 - 2773