Clear-cell Variant of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Presenting as a Palatal Mass in a 10-Year-old Boy

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Sophia H. [1 ]
O'toole, Thomas R. [2 ]
Meyer, Reid G. [3 ]
Geiersbach, Katherine B. [3 ]
Islam, Mohammed N. [4 ]
Cheng, Lirong [5 ]
Lai, Jinping [6 ]
机构
[1] Mira Loma High Sch, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Diagnost Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Roseville Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Roseville, CA USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Sacramento, CA 95825 USA
关键词
Child; clear-cell variant; mucoepidermoid carcinoma; minor salivary gland; MAML2; rearrangement; and fluorescence in situ hybridization;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.16238
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The clear-cell variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) involving minor salivary glands is extremely rare in children. Case Report: We report a case of clear-cell variant MEC in the minor salivary gland in a 10year-old boy who presented with a mass of the right hard palate. Fine-needle aspiration showed features suggestive of clear-cell variant of MEC. Microscopically, the tumor cells showed predominant clear cells and scattered mucous cells. There was increased mitotic activity (6/mm2). No tumor necrosis or nuclear pleomorphism was identified. The tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7), tumor protein p63, P40 (& UDelta;Np63), CK5/6 and mucicarmine. Rearrangement of mastermind-like transcriptional coactivator 2 (MAML2) (11q21) gene was present in the tumor cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization, supporting the diagnosis of an intermediategrade clear-cell variant of MEC. A right infrastructure maxillectomy for palate carcinoma with negative margins was performed. Grossly, the tumor was a 2.1 cm wellcircumscribed, friable, pale tan mass with focal areas of cystic change. The final pathological diagnosis was clear-cell variant of MEC, intermediate grade, pT2. Post surgery, the patient recovered and was doing well, with no tumor recurrence or metastasis at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of clear -cell variant MEC in a child. Due to low to intermediate tumor grade, an overtly aggressive treatment should be avoided in a child.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 942
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] My life as a 10-year-old boy
    Shapiro, S
    NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 2001, : 22 - 22
  • [22] Neurocardiogenic syncope in a 10-year-old boy
    Meyer, K
    Galler, A
    Lietz, R
    Siekmeyer, W
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (05) : 415 - 416
  • [23] Painful limp in a 10-year-old boy
    Neel, MD
    Toy, PC
    Kaste, SC
    Jenkins, JJ
    Daw, N
    Rao, BN
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (410) : 326 - 333
  • [24] SYPHILITIC NEPHROPATHY IN A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY
    LOGHMANADHAM, M
    LONDON, R
    HEREDIA, R
    LEVY, H
    HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1984, 19 (12): : JJ84 - &
  • [25] A 10-year-old Boy with Saber Shins
    Fabie, Noelle Andrea V.
    Misra, Vinod K.
    PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2018, 39 (10) : 523 - +
  • [26] A 10-year-old boy with hip pain
    Hosalkar, HS
    Shaw, BA
    Siongco, A
    Ceppi, C
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (397) : 434 - 441
  • [27] Neurocardiogenic Syncope in a 10-Year-Old Boy
    K. Meyer
    A. Galler
    R. Lietz
    W. Siekmeyer
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2001, 22 : 415 - 416
  • [28] "Media Addiction" in a 10-Year-Old Boy
    Brown, Scott
    Scharf, Michael A.
    Bustos, Cristina
    Chavira, Denise
    Stein, Martin T.
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2013, 34 (05): : 375 - 376
  • [29] INVERTED PAPILLOMA IN A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY
    STANLEY, RJ
    KELLY, JA
    MATTA, II
    FALKENBERG, J
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1984, 110 (12) : 813 - 815
  • [30] WERNICKES APHASIA IN A 10-YEAR-OLD BOY
    VANHOUT, A
    LYON, G
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1986, 29 (02) : 268 - 285