GPT-4 passes the bar exam

被引:82
|
作者
Katz, Daniel Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bommarito, Michael James [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gao, Shang [5 ]
Arredondo, Pablo [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chicago Kent Coll Law, Illinois Tech, Chicago, IL 60661 USA
[2] Stanford Ctr Legal Informat, CodeX, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Bucerius Law Sch, Hamburg, Germany
[4] 273 Ventures LLC, Woburn, MA USA
[5] Casetext Inc, Herndon, VA USA
关键词
large language models; Bar Exam; GPT-4; legal services; legal complexity; legal language; LAW;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2023.0254
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the zero-shot performance of GPT-4 against prior generations of GPT on the entire uniform bar examination (UBE), including not only the multiple-choice multistate bar examination (MBE), but also the open-ended multistate essay exam (MEE) and multistate performance test (MPT) components. On the MBE, GPT-4 significantly outperforms both human test-takers and prior models, demonstrating a 26% increase over ChatGPT and beating humans in five of seven subject areas. On the MEE and MPT, which have not previously been evaluated by scholars, GPT-4 scores an average of 4.2/6.0 when compared with much lower scores for ChatGPT. Graded across the UBE components, in the manner in which a human test-taker would be, GPT-4 scores approximately 297 points, significantly in excess of the passing threshold for all UBE jurisdictions. These findings document not just the rapid and remarkable advance of large language model performance generally, but also the potential for such models to support the delivery of legal services in society.This article is part of the theme issue 'A complexity science approach to law and governance'.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re-evaluating GPT-4's bar exam performance
    Martinez, Eric
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2024,
  • [2] Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions
    Miao, Jing
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Cornell, Lynn D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 162 (03) : 220 - 226
  • [3] Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Reply to "Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions"
    Miao, Jing
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Cornell, Lynn D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [5] Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Polish National Specialty Exam (NSE) in Ophthalmology
    Ciekalski, Marcin
    Laskowski, Maciej
    Koperczak, Agnieszka
    Smierciak, Maria
    Sirek, Sebastian
    POSTEPY HIGIENY I MEDYCYNY DOSWIADCZALNEJ, 2024, 78 (01): : 111 - 116
  • [6] Is GPT-4 a reliable rater? Evaluating consistency in GPT-4's text ratings
    Hackl, Veronika
    Mueller, Alexandra Elena
    Granitzer, Michael
    Sailer, Maximilian
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [7] Comparing Vision-Capable Models, GPT-4 and Gemini, With GPT-3.5 on Taiwan's Pulmonologist Exam
    Chen, Chih-Hsiung
    Hsieh, Kuang-Yu
    Huang, Kuo-En
    Lai, Hsien-Yun
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [8] GPT-4 as a biomedical simulator
    Schaefer M.
    Reichl S.
    ter Horst R.
    Nicolas A.M.
    Krausgruber T.
    Piras F.
    Stepper P.
    Bock C.
    Samwald M.
    Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 178
  • [9] Evaluating Large Language Models for the National Premedical Exam in India: Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard
    Farhat, Faiza
    Chaudhry, Beenish Moalla
    Nadeem, Mohammad
    Sohail, Shahab Saquib
    Madsen, Dag Oivind
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 10
  • [10] GPT-4 and Ophthalmology Operative Notes
    Waisberg, Ethan
    Ong, Joshua
    Masalkhi, Mouayad
    Kamran, Sharif Amit
    Zaman, Nasif
    Sarker, Prithul
    Lee, Andrew G.
    Tavakkoli, Alireza
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (11) : 2353 - 2355