Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Polish National Specialty Exam (NSE) in Ophthalmology

被引:0
|
作者
Ciekalski, Marcin [1 ]
Laskowski, Maciej [1 ]
Koperczak, Agnieszka [1 ]
Smierciak, Maria [1 ]
Sirek, Sebastian [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Fac Med Sci Katowice, Student Sci Soc, Dept Ophthalmol, Katowice, Poland
[2] Med Univ Siles, Fac Med Sci Katowice, Dept Ophthalmol, Katowice, Poland
来源
关键词
ophthalmology; ChatGPT; Polish national specialty exam;
D O I
10.2478/ahem-2024-0006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved significantly, driven by advancements in computing power and big data. Technologies like machine learning and deep learning have led to sophisticated models such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. This study assesses the performance of these AI models on the Polish National Specialty Exam in ophthalmology, exploring their potential to support research, education, and clinical decision-making in healthcare.Materials and Methods The study analyzed 98 questions from the Spring 2023 Polish NSE in Ophthalmology. Questions were categorized into five groups: Physiology & Diagnostics, Clinical & Case Questions, Treatment & Pharmacology, Surgery, and Pediatrics. GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 were tested for their accuracy in answering these questions, with a confidence rating from 1 to 5 assigned to each response. Statistical analyses, including the Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test, were employed to compare the models' performance.Results GPT-4 demonstrated a significant improvement over GPT-3.5, correctly answering 63.3% of questions compared to GPT-3.5's 37.8%. GPT-4's performance met the passing criteria for the NSE. The models showed varying degrees of accuracy across different categories, with a notable gap in fields like surgery and pediatrics.Conclusions The study highlights the potential of GPT models in aiding clinical decisions and educational purposes in ophthalmology. However, it also underscores the models' limitations, particularly in specialized fields like surgery and pediatrics. The findings suggest that while AI models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can significantly assist in the medical field, they require further development and fine-tuning to address specific challenges in various medical domains.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 116
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GPT-4 passes the bar exam
    Katz, Daniel Martin
    Bommarito, Michael James
    Gao, Shang
    Arredondo, Pablo
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2024, 382 (2270):
  • [2] Comment on: ‘Comparison of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human user performance on a practice ophthalmology written examination’ and ‘ChatGPT in ophthalmology: the dawn of a new era?’
    Nima Ghadiri
    Eye, 2024, 38 : 654 - 655
  • [3] Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions
    Miao, Jing
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Cornell, Lynn D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 162 (03) : 220 - 226
  • [4] Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [5] GPT-4 and Ophthalmology Operative Notes
    Waisberg, Ethan
    Ong, Joshua
    Masalkhi, Mouayad
    Kamran, Sharif Amit
    Zaman, Nasif
    Sarker, Prithul
    Lee, Andrew G.
    Tavakkoli, Alireza
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (11) : 2353 - 2355
  • [6] GPT-4 and Ophthalmology Operative Notes
    Ethan Waisberg
    Joshua Ong
    Mouayad Masalkhi
    Sharif Amit Kamran
    Nasif Zaman
    Prithul Sarker
    Andrew G. Lee
    Alireza Tavakkoli
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 51 : 2353 - 2355
  • [8] ChatGPT/GPT-4 and Spinal Surgeons
    Amnuay Kleebayoon
    Viroj Wiwanitkit
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 51 : 1657 - 1657
  • [9] ChatGPT/GPT-4 and Spinal Surgeons
    Kleebayoon, Amnuay
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (08) : 1657 - 1657
  • [10] Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations
    Ali, Rohaid
    Tang, Oliver Y.
    Connolly, Ian D.
    Sullivan, Patricia L. Zadnik
    Shin, John H.
    Fridley, Jared S.
    Asaad, Wael F.
    Cielo, Deus
    Oyelese, Adetokunbo A.
    Doberstein, Curtis E.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    Telfeian, Albert E.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1353 - 1365