Localized keyhole pore prediction during laser powder bed fusion via multimodal process monitoring and X-ray radiography

被引:8
|
作者
Gorgannejad, Sanam [1 ]
Martin, Aiden A. [1 ]
Nicolino, Jenny W. [1 ]
Strantza, Maria [1 ]
Guss, Gabriel M. [1 ]
Khairallah, Saad [1 ]
Forien, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Thampy, Vivek [2 ]
Liu, Sen [2 ]
Quan, Peiyu [2 ]
Tassone, Christopher J. [2 ]
Calta, Nicholas P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Stanford Synchrotron Radiat Lightsource, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In situ monitoring; X-ray radiography; Keyhole pore identification; Sensor fusion; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; FAULT-DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION; HCTSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2023.103810
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Systematic fault detection and control during laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has been a long-standing objective for system manufacturers and researchers in the additive manufacturing (AM) industry. This manuscript investigates a data fusion approach for detection of keyhole porosity formation during laser irradiation of Ti-6Al-4V substrates by concurrent recording of thermally induced optical emission measured using both off-axis and coaxial photodiode sensors, and acoustic emission. Subsurface defect formation was monitored via high-speed synchrotron X-ray imaging at 20,000 frames per second, enabling temporal registration of keyhole pore formation events to the monitoring signals at a resolution of 50 mu s. We developed data fusion machine learning (ML) models for localized prediction of keyhole pore formation at various time scales ranging from 0.5 ms to 2 ms. The signal segments were featurized using two independent approaches: (1) power spectral density (PSD) and (2) highly comparative time series analysis (HCTSA) framework. The extracted features from different sensor mo-dalities were fused together to construct a multimodal feature space and sequential feature selection was used to determine the most informative features for training the ML models. The predictive performance was evaluated for three classifying algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). As a result, pore formation events were predicted with up to 0.95 F1-score, 1.0 recall and 0.94 accuracy. The most heavily weighted features indicate that model performance is chiefly governed by the acoustic monitoring signal, with a secondary contribution from the optical emission sensors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterizing the effects of laser control in laser powder bed fusion on near-surface pore formation via combined analysis of in-situ melt pool monitoring and X-ray computed tomography
    Kim, F. H.
    Yeung, H.
    Garboczi, E. J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 48 (48)
  • [32] Evolution and prediction of lack of fusion pores in laser powder bed fusion process based on in-situ monitoring
    Li, Jiansen
    Zhang, Kai
    Liao, Wenhe
    Liu, Tingting
    Zou, Zhiyong
    Chen, Rong
    Wei, Huiliang
    MEASUREMENT, 2025, 245
  • [33] Unravel melt pool and bubble dynamics during laser powder bed fusion of polyamides using synchrotron X-ray imaging and process simulation
    Leung, Chu Lun Alex
    Gardy, Jabbar
    Isaacs, Mark
    Marathe, Shashidhara
    Klosowski, Michal M.
    Shinjo, Junji
    Panwisawas, Chinnapat
    Lee, Peter D.
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [34] Melting behavior in laser powder bed fusion revealed by in situ X-ray and thermal imaging
    Yuki Wakai
    Tomoya Ogura
    Shizuka Nakano
    Naoko Sato
    Satoshi Kajino
    Shinsuke Suzuki
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 110 : 1047 - 1059
  • [35] Melting behavior in laser powder bed fusion revealed by in situ X-ray and thermal imaging
    Wakai, Yuki
    Ogura, Tomoya
    Nakano, Shizuka
    Sato, Naoko
    Kajino, Satoshi
    Suzuki, Shinsuke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 110 (3-4): : 1047 - 1059
  • [36] LAYERWISE IN-PROCESS QUALITY MONITORING IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION
    Imani, Farhad
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    Montazeri, Mohammad
    Rao, Prahalada
    Yang, Hui
    Reutzel, Edward
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 13TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [37] Towards In-process Prediction of Voids in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    O'Loughlin, Sean
    Dutton, Benjamin
    Semaj, Gent
    Snell, Eric
    Rindler, Jacob
    Groeber, Michael A.
    JOM, 2021, 73 (11) : 3240 - 3249
  • [38] Towards In-process Prediction of Voids in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Sean O’Loughlin
    Benjamin Dutton
    Gent Semaj
    Eric Snell
    Jacob Rindler
    Michael A. Groeber
    JOM, 2021, 73 : 3240 - 3249
  • [39] Quantifying the mechanisms of keyhole pore evolutions and the role of metal-vapor condensation in laser powder bed fusion
    Yu, Tao
    Zhao, Jidong
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 72
  • [40] Research on an Online Monitoring Device for the Powder Laying Process of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Wei, Bin
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Li, Jie
    Zhao, Zigeng
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Guang
    Liu, Lijian
    Chang, Hongjie
    MICROMACHINES, 2024, 15 (01)