At the intersection of human and algorithmic decision-making in distributed learning

被引:3
|
作者
Prinsloo, Paul [1 ]
Slade, Sharon [2 ]
Khalil, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, Unisa, Coll Econ & Management Sci, Open & Distance Learning ODL,Dept Business Manage, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Earth Trust, London, England
[3] Univ Bergen, Ctr Sci Learning & Technol SLATE, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Artificial intelligence (AI); distributed learning; human-algorithmic decision-making; STUDENT SUCCESS; EDUCATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/15391523.2022.2121343
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article seeks to explore different combinations of human and Artificial Intelligence (AI) decision-making in the context of distributed learning. Distributed learning institutions face specific challenges such as high levels of student attrition and ensuring quality, cost-effective student support at scale using a range of technologies, such as AI. While there is an expanding body of research on AI in education (AIEd), this conceptual article proposes that combinations of human-algorithmic decision-making systems need careful and critical consideration, not only for their potential, but also for their appropriateness and ethical considerations. We operationalize a framework designed to consider robot autonomy at four key events in students' learning journeys, namely (1) admission and registration; (2) student advising and support; (3) augmenting pedagogy; and (4) formative and summative assessment. We conclude the article by providing pointers for operationalizing options in human-algorithmic decision-making in distributed teaming contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 47
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the Impact of Explanations on Understanding of Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Schmude, Timothee
    Koesten, Laura
    Moeller, Torsten
    Tschiatschek, Sebastian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2023, 2023, : 959 - 970
  • [32] Contrastive Counterfactual Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Mutlu, Ece Cigdem
    Yousefi, Niloofar
    Garibay, Ozlem Ozmen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 499 - 507
  • [33] COMPETITIVE DISTRIBUTED DECISION-MAKING
    DENG, XT
    PAPADIMITRIOU, CH
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 12 : 350 - 356
  • [34] Competitive distributed decision-making
    Deng, XT
    Papadimitriou, CH
    ALGORITHMICA, 1996, 16 (02) : 133 - 150
  • [35] STRUCTURES FOR DISTRIBUTED DECISION-MAKING
    TENNEY, RR
    SANDELL, NR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1981, 11 (08): : 517 - 527
  • [36] Agents for distributed decision-making
    Talukdar, S
    2003 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 42 - 43
  • [37] STRATEGIES FOR DISTRIBUTED DECISION-MAKING
    TENNEY, RR
    SANDELL, NR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1981, 11 (08): : 527 - 538
  • [38] Algorithmic Pollution: Understanding and Responding to Negative Consequences of Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Marjanovic, Olivera
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka
    Vidgen, Richard
    LIVING WITH MONSTERS?: SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF ALGORITHMIC PHENOMENA, HYBRID AGENCY, AND THE PERFORMATIVITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 543 : 31 - 47
  • [39] The Algorithmic Leviathan: Arbitrariness, Fairness, and Opportunity in Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems
    Creel, Kathleen
    Hellman, Deborah
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 52 (01) : 26 - 43
  • [40] Human and algorithmic decision-making in the personnel selection process: A comparative bibliometric on bias
    Da Conceicao Santos Silva, Humberta Karinne
    Vasconcellos, Liliana
    COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 17 (01) : 175 - 189