Optimal Dosing of Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

被引:6
|
作者
Valdes, Eduard [1 ]
Fang, Taolin [2 ]
Boffa, Michael [2 ]
Frontera, Jennifer A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Univ, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Neurol, New York, NY 10016 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Keppra; levetiracetam; mediation analysis; prophylaxis; seizure; therapeutic level; ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURES;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000006065
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES:Critically ill patients eliminate levetiracetam (LEV) more rapidly than healthy controls, yet low doses are commonly used for seizure prophylaxis in the ICU setting. We compared the rates of achievement of target serum levels and new onset seizure (clinical and/or electrographic) among patients who received low (500 mg bid) versus high (750-1,000 mg bid) dose LEV.DESIGN:Prospective, observational study.SETTING:Tertiary care, academic center.PATIENTS:We included patients who received prophylactic LEV following traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, or supratentorial neurosurgery between 2019 and 2021. Patients with a history of seizure, antiseizure medication use, or renal failure requiring dialysis were excluded.INTERVENTIONS:None.Measurements:LEV levels were obtained at steady state. The impact of low-dose versus high-dose LEV on the primary outcome of target LEV levels (12-46 mu g/mL), and the secondary outcome of clinical and/or electrographic seizure, were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, LEV loading dose, BMI, primary diagnosis and creatinine clearance (CrCl).Main Results:Of the 205 subjects included in analyses, n = 106 (52%) received LEV 500 mg bid (median 13 mg/kg/d), and n = 99 (48%) received LEV 750-1,000 mg bid (median 25 mg/kg/d). Overall, 111 of 205 patients (54%) achieved target levels: 48 (45%) from the low-dose group versus 63 (64%) from the high-dose group (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; p = 0.009). In multivariable analyses, high-dose LEV predicted target levels (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.23; 95% CI, 1.16-4.27; p = 0.016), and was associated with lower seizure odds (aOR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.82; p = 0.018) after adjusting for age, loading dose, BMI, diagnosis, and CrCl.CONCLUSIONS:Underdosing of LEV was common, with only 54% of patients achieving target serum levels. Higher doses (750-1,000 mg bid) were more than twice as likely to lead to optimal drug levels and reduced the odds of seizure by 68% compared with low-dose regimens (500 mg bid).
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enoxaparin Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Dosing in Critically Ill Underweight Patients
    Curcio, Elizabeth
    Meester, Alyssa S.
    Harding, Angela
    Lockhart, Marie M.
    Dillis, John
    HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2025,
  • [22] Colistin Use in Critically Ill Patients In Search of the Optimal Dosing
    De Pascale, Gennaro
    Sandroni, Claudio
    Antonelli, Massimo
    CHEST, 2011, 139 (01) : 234 - 234
  • [23] LEVETIRACETAM DOSING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY
    Chaijamorn, Weerachai
    Charoensareerat, Taniya
    Sathienluckana, Thanompong
    Phunpon, Sathian
    Pattharachayakul, Sutthiporn
    Rungkitwattanakul, Dhakrit
    Srisawat, Nattachai
    NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 25 : 43 - 43
  • [24] Levetiracetam use in critically ill patients
    Jerzy P. Szaflarski
    Jason M. Meckler
    Magdalena Szaflarski
    Lori A. Shutter
    Michael D. Privitera
    Stephen L. Yates
    Neurocritical Care, 2007, 7 : 140 - 147
  • [25] Levetiracetam use in critically ill patients
    Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
    Meckler, Jason M.
    Szaflarski, Magdalena
    Shutter, Lori A.
    Privitera, Michael D.
    Yates, Stephen L.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2007, 7 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [26] Abdominal perfusion pressure in critically ill cirrhotic patients: a prospective observational study
    Pereira, Rui Antunes
    Esteves, Andre F.
    Cardoso, Filipe S.
    Perdigoto, Rui
    Marcelino, Paulo
    Saliba, Faouzi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [27] Erythropoietin response in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational study
    Alan J DeAngelo
    David G Bell
    Michael W Quinn
    Deborah Ebert Long
    Daniel R Ouellette
    Critical Care, 9
  • [28] Assessment of sedation by automated pupillometry in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study
    Shi, Lin
    Jin, Dan-Ni
    Cao, Xia-Jing
    Liu, Hong
    Gu, Wen-Jie
    Zhang, Mao
    Lu, Qin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 877 - 885
  • [29] The impact of frailty in critically ill patients after trauma: A prospective observational study
    Tipping, Claire J.
    Bilish, Emily
    Harrold, Meg
    Holland, Anne E.
    Chan, Terry
    Hodgson, Carol L.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 (03) : 228 - 235
  • [30] Vancomycin levels are frequently subtherapeutic in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study
    Bakke, V.
    Sporsem, H.
    Von der Lippe, E.
    Nordoy, I.
    Lao, Y.
    Nyrerod, H. C.
    Sandvik, L.
    Harvig, K. R.
    Bugge, J. F.
    Helset, E.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 61 (06) : 627 - 635