Diagnostic accuracy of ancillary tests for death by neurologic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Briard, Joel Neves [1 ,2 ]
Nitulescu, Roy [2 ]
Lemoine, Emile [1 ]
Titova, Polina [2 ]
McIntyre, Lauralyn [3 ]
English, Shane W. [3 ,4 ]
Knoll, Greg [3 ]
Shemie, Sam D. [5 ]
Martin, Claudio [6 ]
Turgeon, Alexis F. [7 ,8 ]
Lauzier, Francois [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [3 ]
Chasse, Michael [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Neurosci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, 900 Rue St Denis, Montreal, PQ H2X 3H8, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Div Crit Care Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] CHU Quebec Univ Laval Res Ctr, Populat Hlth & Optimal Hlth Pract Res Unit Trauma, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Univ Laval, Dept Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[10] Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
ancillary test; brain death; death by neurologic criteria; meta-analysis; systematic review; BRAIN-DEATH; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-023-02426-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposeAncillary tests are frequently used in death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC), particularly when the clinical neurologic examination is unreliable. Nevertheless, their diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to synthesize the sensitivity and specificity of commonly used ancillary tests for DNC.SourceWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and CINAHL Ebsco from their inception to 4 February 2022. We selected cohort and case-control studies including patients with 1) clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria or 2) clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria who underwent ancillary testing for DNC. We excluded studies without a priori diagnostic criteria and studies conducted solely on pediatric patients. Accepted reference standards were clinical examination, four-vessel conventional angiography, and radionuclide imaging. Data were directly extracted from published reports. We assessed the methodological quality of studies with the QUADAS-2 tool and estimated ancillary test sensitivities and specificities using hierarchical Bayesian models with diffuse priors.Principal findingsOverall, 137 records met the selection criteria. One study (0.7%) had a low risk of bias in all QUADAS-2 domains. Among clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 8,891), ancillary tests had similar pooled sensitivities (range, 0.82-0.93). Sensitivity heterogeneity was greater within (sigma = 0.10-0.15) than between (sigma = 0.04) ancillary test types. Among clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 2,732), pooled ancillary test sensitivities ranged between 0.81 and 1.00 and specificities between 0.87 and 1.00. Most estimates had high statistical uncertainty.ConclusionStudies assessing ancillary test diagnostic accuracy have an unclear or high risk of bias. High-quality studies are required to thoroughly validate ancillary tests for DNC.Study registrationPROSPERO (CRD42013005907); registered 7 October 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 748
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring brain perfusion by CT or MR as ancillary tests for diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramos, Joao N.
    Pinto, Catarina
    Silva, Vera Cruz e
    Topriceanu, Constantin-Cristian
    Bisdas, Sotirios
    BJR OPEN, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [42] Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Campbell, Jared M.
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Ding, Sandrine
    Carmody, Dennis P.
    Hakonsen, Sasja J.
    Jadotte, Yuri T.
    White, Sarahlouise
    Munn, Zachary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 154 - 162
  • [43] Diagnostic Accuracy of the ID Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cousins, Grainne
    Hijazze, Samira
    Van de Laar, Floris A.
    Fahey, Tom
    HEADACHE, 2011, 51 (07): : 1140 - 1148
  • [44] The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoeboer, S. H.
    van der Geest, P. J.
    Nieboer, D.
    Groeneveld, A. B. J.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2015, 21 (05) : 474 - 481
  • [45] Diagnostic accuracy for skin cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Jennifer
    Fernandez, Kristen
    Reddy, Rasika
    Fadadu, Raj
    Kohn, Michael
    Kim, Mi-Ok
    Wei, Maria
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 89 (03) : AB148 - AB148
  • [46] Ancillary investigations for death determination in infants and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    McKinnon, Nicole K.
    Maratta, Christina
    Zuckier, Lionel S.
    Boyd, J. Gordon
    Chasse, Michael
    Hornby, Laura
    Kramer, Andreas
    Kromm, Julie
    Mooney, Owen T.
    Muthusami, Prakash
    Nitulescu, Roy
    Park, Jaewoo
    Slessarev, Marat
    Basmaji, John
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2023, 70 (04): : 749 - 770
  • [47] Death by neurologic criteria: pathophysiology, definition, diagnostic criteria and tests
    Robba, Chiara
    Iaquaniello, Carolina
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2019, 85 (07) : 774 - 781
  • [48] Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for diagnosis of melioidosis
    Fairley, Lachlan
    Smith, Samuel
    Maisrikrod, Shalisa
    Henning, Lars
    ACTA TROPICA, 2021, 214
  • [49] Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Adenomyosis Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Review of Sonographic Diagnostic Criteria
    Liu, Linly
    Li, Wentao
    Leonardi, Mathew
    Condous, George
    Da Silva Costa, Fabricio
    Mol, Ben W.
    Wong, Lufee
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (11) : 2289 - 2306
  • [50] Accuracy of the GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huo, Zhenyu
    Chong, Feifei
    Yin, Liangyu
    Lu, Zongliang
    Liu, Jie
    Xu, Hongxia
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2022, 41 (06) : 1208 - 1217