Diagnostic accuracy of ancillary tests for death by neurologic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Briard, Joel Neves [1 ,2 ]
Nitulescu, Roy [2 ]
Lemoine, Emile [1 ]
Titova, Polina [2 ]
McIntyre, Lauralyn [3 ]
English, Shane W. [3 ,4 ]
Knoll, Greg [3 ]
Shemie, Sam D. [5 ]
Martin, Claudio [6 ]
Turgeon, Alexis F. [7 ,8 ]
Lauzier, Francois [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [3 ]
Chasse, Michael [2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Neurosci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, 900 Rue St Denis, Montreal, PQ H2X 3H8, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Div Crit Care Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] CHU Quebec Univ Laval Res Ctr, Populat Hlth & Optimal Hlth Pract Res Unit Trauma, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Univ Laval, Dept Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[10] Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
ancillary test; brain death; death by neurologic criteria; meta-analysis; systematic review; BRAIN-DEATH; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-023-02426-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
PurposeAncillary tests are frequently used in death determination by neurologic criteria (DNC), particularly when the clinical neurologic examination is unreliable. Nevertheless, their diagnostic accuracy has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to synthesize the sensitivity and specificity of commonly used ancillary tests for DNC.SourceWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and CINAHL Ebsco from their inception to 4 February 2022. We selected cohort and case-control studies including patients with 1) clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria or 2) clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria who underwent ancillary testing for DNC. We excluded studies without a priori diagnostic criteria and studies conducted solely on pediatric patients. Accepted reference standards were clinical examination, four-vessel conventional angiography, and radionuclide imaging. Data were directly extracted from published reports. We assessed the methodological quality of studies with the QUADAS-2 tool and estimated ancillary test sensitivities and specificities using hierarchical Bayesian models with diffuse priors.Principal findingsOverall, 137 records met the selection criteria. One study (0.7%) had a low risk of bias in all QUADAS-2 domains. Among clinically diagnosed death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 8,891), ancillary tests had similar pooled sensitivities (range, 0.82-0.93). Sensitivity heterogeneity was greater within (sigma = 0.10-0.15) than between (sigma = 0.04) ancillary test types. Among clinically suspected death by neurologic criteria patients (n = 2,732), pooled ancillary test sensitivities ranged between 0.81 and 1.00 and specificities between 0.87 and 1.00. Most estimates had high statistical uncertainty.ConclusionStudies assessing ancillary test diagnostic accuracy have an unclear or high risk of bias. High-quality studies are required to thoroughly validate ancillary tests for DNC.Study registrationPROSPERO (CRD42013005907); registered 7 October 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 748
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of tests for leprosy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurung, P.
    Gomes, C. M.
    Vernal, S.
    Leeflang, M. M. G.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) : 1315 - 1327
  • [2] Sensitivity of Ancillary Testing in Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Briard, Joel Neves
    Nitulescu, Roy
    Lemoine, Emile
    McIntyre, Lauralyn
    English, Shane
    Knoll, Greg
    Shemie, Sam
    Martin, Claudio
    Turgeon, Alexis
    Lauzier, Francois
    Fergusson, Dean
    Chasse, Michael
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Reiman, Michael P.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Cook, Chad E.
    Wright, Alexis A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (14) : 893 - 902
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haroon, Shamil
    Jordan, Rachel
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Adab, Peymane
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [5] Accuracy of diagnostic tests for feline sporotrichosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Domingos, Eric L.
    Souza, Dalton A.
    Alves, Fernando M. S.
    Gorski, Daniela
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Ferreira, Luana M.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    ACTA TROPICA, 2025, 263
  • [6] Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Tarrio, Isabel
    Blumenthal, Kimberly G.
    Araujo, Luis
    Azevedo, Luis Filipe
    Delgado, Luis
    Fonseca, Joao Almedia
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 147 (01) : 296 - 308
  • [7] Accuracy of cholera rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muzembo, Basilua Andre
    Kitahara, Kei
    Debnath, Anusuya
    Okamoto, Keinosuke
    Miyoshi, Shin-Ichi
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [8] Accuracy of tuberculosis diagnostic tests in small ruminants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roy, A.
    Infantes-Lorenzo, J. A.
    de la Cruz, M. L.
    Dominguez, L.
    Alvarez, J.
    Bezos, J.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 182
  • [9] Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for the Detection of Chagas Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Candia-Puma, Mayron Antonio
    Machaca-Luque, Laura Yesenia
    Roque-Pumahuanca, Brychs Milagros
    Galdino, Alexsandro Sobreira
    Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
    Ferraz Coelho, Eduardo Antonio
    Chavez-Fumagalli, Miguel Angel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (11)
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of urinary antigen tests for legionellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kawasaki, Takeshi
    Nakagawa, Natsuki
    Murata, Maki
    Yasuo, Shunsuke
    Yoshida, Takuo
    Ando, Koichi
    Okamori, Satoshi
    Okada, Yohei
    RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 60 (02) : 205 - 214