Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction

被引:6
|
作者
Ahmed, Shahnur [1 ]
Lee, Jason T. C. [1 ]
Roth, Dylan [1 ]
Sinha, Mithun [1 ]
Fisher, Carla [1 ]
Fan, Betty [1 ]
Imeokparia, Folasade [1 ]
Ludwig, Kandice [1 ]
Lester, Mary E. [1 ]
Hassanein, Aladdin H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Div Plast Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, 545 Barnhill Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CALCIUM-SULFATE BEADS; BREAST; INFECTION; OSTEOMYELITIS; OXYCHLOROSENE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000005353
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Infections are problematic in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction with infection rates as high as 30%. Strategies to reduce the risk of infection have demonstrated various efficacies. A prolonged course of systemic, oral antibiotics has not shown evidence-based benefit. Although absorbable antibiotic beads have been described for orthopedic procedures and pressure wounds, their use has not been well studied during breast reconstruction, particularly for prepectoral implant placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selective use of prophylactic absorbable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads during high-risk implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients who underwent implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Groups were divided into those who received antibiotic beads and those who did not. Outcome variables included postoperative infection at 90 days. A total of 148 patients (256 implants) were included: 15 patients (31 implants) who received biodegradable antibiotic beads and 133 patients (225 implants) in the control group. Patients who received antibiotic beads were more likely to have a history of infection (66.7%) compared with the control group (0%) (P < 0.01). Surgical site infection occurred in 3.2% of implants in the antibiotic bead group compared with 7.6%, but this did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of infection in high-risk patients who have absorbable antibiotic beads placed during the time of reconstruction seems to be normalized to the control group in this pilot study. We present a novel use of prophylactic absorbable antibiotic beads in prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Varvaras, D.
    Nina, H.
    De Felice, V.
    Al-Lawati, T.
    Angeletti, M.
    Tardioli, S.
    Papadopoulos, G.
    Petrella, G.
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : S124 - S124
  • [22] Prepectoral versus retropectoral implant-based breast reconstruction - The surgical and radiotherapeutical perspective
    Deutschmann, C.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, D.
    Dorffner, G.
    Singer, C.
    Leser, C.
    Kauer-Dorner, D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [23] Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Yang, Jun Young
    Kim, Chan Woo
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Seung Ki
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Hwang, Euna
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (06): : 550 - 557
  • [24] Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Scheflan, Michael
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Ben Yehuda, Dafna
    Lotan, Adi Maisel
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (11) : E3265
  • [25] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447
  • [26] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction How Do We Choose?
    Vingan, Perri S.
    Kim, Minji
    Rochlin, Danielle
    Allen Jr, Robert J.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 32 (04) : 761 - 776
  • [27] Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes
    Thuman, Jenna M.
    Worbowtiz, Nestor
    Jain, Abishek
    Ulm, Jason P.
    Delaney, Kevin O.
    Herrera, Fernando A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S560 - S566
  • [28] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach That Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Ad-El, Dean D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 318E - 318E
  • [29] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Li, Shangshan
    Luan, Jie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (03) : 508E - 509E
  • [30] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Momeni, Arash
    Kanchwala, Suhail
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (05) : 1109 - 1115