机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Thielman, Emily J.
[1
]
Reavis, Kelly M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Reavis, Kelly M.
[1
,2
]
Theodoroff, Sarah M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Theodoroff, Sarah M.
[1
,3
]
Grush, Leslie D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Grush, Leslie D.
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Thapa, Samrita
[1
,3
]
Smith, Brandon D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Smith, Brandon D.
[1
,3
]
Schultz, James
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hearing Ctr Excellence HCE, Dept Def, San Antonio, TX USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Schultz, James
[4
]
Henry, James A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USAVA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
Henry, James A.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, VA Rehabil Res & Dev RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabil Auditor, Vet Affairs, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USA
[4] Hearing Ctr Excellence HCE, Dept Def, San Antonio, TX USA
Purpose: The Tinnitus Screener was introduced in 2015 as a four-item algorith-mic instrument to assess the temporal characteristics of a person's reported tin-nitus. The Tinnitus Screener was then revised as a six-item version to include a new temporal category and to capture tinnitus duration (acute < 6 months vs. chronic >= 6 months). When contrasted with audiologist assessment, the four-item Tinnitus Screener was determined to be highly valid, but the short-term reliability of either version remained unknown. The present analysis focused on determining the test-retest reliability of the six-item Tinnitus Screener. Addition-ally, we sought to determine whether reliability differed by respondent age, sex, military status, and hearing loss. Method: The Tinnitus Screener was administered to 190 military Service mem-bers and 250 military Veterans at two time points separated by 7-31 days. Our analysis focused on test-retest reliability of responses as measured by the kappa coefficient, overall and within subsamples. Percent agreement of tinnitus categori-zation (temporal categories) and classification (positive/negative) between the two time points was also evaluated. Results: Constant or intermittent tinnitus was found in 31% of Service mem-bers and 53% of Veterans. Overall, kappa reliability coefficients were high, near .80, indicating substantial reliability. The majority (96%) of reliability coefficients for the Tinnitus Screener within subsamples were similarly high, ranging from .68 to .88. Conclusions: The updated version of the Tinnitus Screener is shown to be a reliable instrument. The Tinnitus Screener is recommended to inform clinical decision making by determining the temporal characteristics of tinnitus.