Laparoscopic vs. open adrenalectomy: perioperative data and survival analysis in 70 dogs with an adrenal tumor

被引:2
|
作者
van Bokhorst, Kirsten L. [1 ,2 ]
Galac, Sara [1 ]
Kooistra, Hans S. [1 ]
de Grauw, Janny C. [1 ,3 ]
Teske, Erik [1 ]
Grinwis, Guy C. M. [4 ]
van Nimwegen, Sebastiaan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] IVC Evidensia, Vleuten, Netherlands
[3] Univ London, Royal Vet Coll, Clin Sci & Serv, London, England
[4] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Biomol Hlth Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
hyperadrenocorticism; hypercortisolism; pheochromocytoma; incidentaloma; recurrence; hypertension; hypotension; GLAND TUMORS; ADRENOCORTICAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMAS; COMPLICATIONS; PITUITARY; LESIONS; MASSES;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2023.1156801
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice in case of functional adrenal tumors and malignant adrenal incidentalomas. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in dogs has gained popularity in recent years, however, clinical studies on large patient populations are scarce. This retrospective study describes perioperative and recurrence data, survival, and prognostic factors in 70 dogs that underwent LA or open adrenalectomy (OA) in our hospital between 2008 and 2022. Diagnosis was based on history, clinical signs, endocrine function tests and advanced diagnostic imaging. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in 42 dogs (n = 27 naturally occurring hypercortisolism, n = 4 pheochromocytoma, n = 1 pheochromocytoma with concurrent hypercortisolism, n = 10 incidentaloma) and OA in 28 dogs (n = 22 hypercortisolism, n = 3 pheochromocytoma, n = 3 incidentaloma). Bilateral adrenalectomy was performed in 8/70 dogs. Surgical duration of LA and OA did not differ significantly in unilateral and bilateral procedures (P = 0.108 and P = 0.101, respectively). Systemic hypertension occurred in 7/41 and 1/28 dogs during LA and OA, respectively (P = 0.130). Hypotension occurred in 2/41 and 4/28 dogs during LA and OA, respectively (P = 0.214). A total of 40/42 dogs in the LA group and 27/28 in the OA group survived to discharge (P = 0.810). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (P = 0.006) after LA (1.5 days, range 1-3) than after OA (2.2 days, range 1-4). No significant differences were demonstrated between LA and OA groups in recurrence of adrenal-dependent endocrine disease (P = 0.332), disease-free period (P = 0.733) and survival time (P = 0.353). The disease-specific 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 95, 89, and 89% after LA and 92, 88, and 81% after OA. Tumor size was significantly associated with the occurrence of a recurrence. In addition, tumor size had a negative effect on the disease-free period and survival time. This study shows a favorable outcome of both LA and OA in dogs. Based on low perioperative complication rate, short hospitalization time and long-term outcomes comparable to OA in selected cases, the less invasive laparoscopic approach is considered the preferred technique.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Open Versus Laparoscopic Staging for Uterine Papillary Serous Cancer: Analysis of Perioperative Complications and Survival
    Lakhi, Nisha
    Voice, Jeanette
    Gopal, Nithya
    Serur, Eli
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2018, 34 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [42] Laparoscopic vs. Open Resection in Patients with Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: Population Outcomes and Survival Patterns
    Huynh, C.
    Minkova, S.
    Kim, D.
    Stuart, H.
    Hamilton, T. D.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S80 - S81
  • [43] Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients:: Long-term complications, quality of life, and survival
    Braga, M
    Frasson, M
    Vignali, A
    Zuliani, W
    Civelli, V
    Di Carlo, V
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (12) : 2217 - 2223
  • [44] Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery: meta-analysis
    Korolija, D
    Tadic, S
    Simic, D
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 387 (9-10) : 366 - 371
  • [45] Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for diverticular disease:: A meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies
    Purkayastha, S
    Constantinides, VA
    Tekkis, PP
    Athanasiou, T
    Aziz, O
    Tilney, H
    Darzi, AW
    Heriot, AG
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (04) : 446 - 463
  • [46] Treatment of median incisional hernia Laparoscopic vs. open surgery: meta-analysis
    Coratti, Francesco
    Coratti, Andrea
    Malatesti, Riccardo
    Varrone, Fabrizio
    Testi, Walter
    Savelli, Vinno
    Borgogni, Vanessa
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2014, 85 (04) : 358 - 363
  • [47] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs. open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Ye, Liangying
    Wu, Xiaojing
    Wu, Tongwei
    Wu, Qijing
    Liu, Zhao
    Liu, Chuan
    Li, Sen
    Chen, Tao
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [48] Open vs. laparoscopic loop ileostomy clousure after colorectal surgery: retrospective analysis
    Rodriguez-Zentner, Homero A.
    Castaneda-Argaiz, Roberto
    Vergara-Fernandez, Omar
    Manuel Moreno-Berber, Jose
    Tapia, Hector
    Velazquez-Fernandez, David
    Gonzalez, Quintin H.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2009, 61 (06): : 461 - 465
  • [49] Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer:: A prospective analysis
    Stroehlein, Michael A.
    Gruetzner, Klaus-Uwe
    Jauch, Karl-Walter
    Heiss, Markus M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [50] Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery: meta-analysis
    D. Korolija
    S. Tadić
    D. Šimić
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2003, 387 : 366 - 371