Safety risks and ethical governance of biomedical applications of synthetic biology

被引:1
|
作者
Ou, Yakun [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Shengjia [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Marxism, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Bioeth, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
synthetic biology; participant safety; biosafety risks; biosecurity risks; ethical governance; public policy; GENE-THERAPY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1292029
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, biomedicine has witnessed rapid advancements in applying synthetic biology. While these advancements have brought numerous benefits to patients, they have also given rise to a series of safety concerns.Methods: This article provides a succinct overview of the current research on synthetic biology's application in biomedicine and systematically analyzes the safety risks associated with this field. Based on this analysis, the article proposes fundamental principles for addressing these issues and presents practical recommendations for ethical governance.Results: This article contends that the primary safety risks associated with the application of synthetic biology in biomedicine include participant safety, biosafety risks, and biosecurity risks. In order to effectively address these risks, it is essential to adhere to the principles of human-centeredness, non-maleficence, sustainability, and reasonable risk control. Guided by these fundamental principles and taking into account China's specific circumstances, this article presents practical recommendations for ethical governance, which include strengthening ethical review, promoting the development and implementation of relevant policies, improving legal safeguards through top-level design, and enhancing technical capabilities for biocontainment.Conclusion: As an emerging field of scientific technology, synthetic biology presents numerous safety risks and challenges in its application within biomedicine. In order to address these risks and challenges, it is imperative that appropriate measures be implemented. From a Chinese perspective, the solutions we propose serve not only to advance the domestic development of synthetic biology but also to contribute to its global progress.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An exploration of synthetic biology: A preliminary Christian ethical assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of synthetic biology
    Rheeder, Riaan A. L.
    IN DIE SKRIFLIG-IN LUCE VERBI, 2014, 48 (02):
  • [32] The role of biomedical engineers in systems/synthetic biology
    Crowe, J. A.
    4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 22 (1-3): : 2714 - 2717
  • [33] Synthetic Biology: State Regulation in the Biomedical Context
    Watson, Julia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2022, 48 (04) : 447 - 468
  • [34] Nanomaterials boost the biomedical application of synthetic biology
    Lei, Qi
    Zhao, Yifan
    Liu, Shuangyu
    Xiao, Yafang
    Yang, Fang
    Guo, Weisheng
    Gu, Ning
    SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS, 2024, 67 (07) : 2051 - 2066
  • [35] Editorial Overview: Synthetic biology and biomedical engineering
    Gersbach, Charles A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 4 : VI - vii
  • [36] ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES POSED BY SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
    Rager-Zisman, Bracha
    PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2012, 55 (04) : 590 - 606
  • [37] Integrating ethical analysis “Into the DNA” of synthetic biology
    Patrick Heavey
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2015, 18 : 121 - 127
  • [38] Integrating ethical analysis "Into the DNA" of synthetic biology
    Heavey, Patrick
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 18 (01) : 121 - 127
  • [39] Challenges in governance of Synthetic Biology: Biorisk assessment
    Kaur, Prasanjeet
    Chugh, Archana
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (03): : 23 - 53
  • [40] Global Health Justice and Governance for Synthetic Biology
    Heavey, Patrick
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (12): : 64 - 65