Does urbanization promote the urban-rural equalization of basic public services? Evidence from prefectural cities in China

被引:18
|
作者
Cheng, Kaiming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shucheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Stat & Math, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Stat Data Engn Technol & Ap, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Basic public services; urban-rural equalization; urbanization; spatial spillover; regional differences; LAND FINANCE; INEQUALITY; BIAS; EFFICIENCY; PROVISION; POVERTY; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2206625
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The question of how urbanization affects the urban-rural equalization of basic public services (BPS) remains unexplored, although BPS equalization is an important means of achieving common prosperity. Based on the BPS supply and demand perspective, we examine the path mechanisms through which urbanization affects urban-rural BPS equalization. Based on panel data from Chinese prefectural cities from 2003 to 2020, a TOPSIS model, combined CRITIC-entropy weights and an information entropy function, are used to measure the level of urban-rural BPS equalization. Considering the spatial spillover effect of urbanization, a dynamic spatial Durbin model is constructed to empirically examine the impact of urbanization. The study found that, overall, the direct and indirect effects of urbanization on urban-rural BPS equalization are significantly positive, and urbanization is conducive to urban-rural BPS equalization improvement in cities and surrounding areas. The effect of urbanization on urban-rural BPS equalization significantly varies between different regions. The study concludes that the process of people-centred urbanization should be accelerated to optimize the spatial layout of BPS, promote high-quality economic development and achieve common prosperity.
引用
收藏
页码:3445 / 3459
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social Organization Participation, Government Governance and the Equalization of Basic Public Services: Evidence from China
    Yang, Gangqiang
    Xue, Yongyu
    Ma, Yuxi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (16)
  • [22] Promotions on the Integration of Urban-rural Public Services and Management in Jiangsu Province, China
    Liu Ai-lian
    Li Lun
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (7TH), VOL II, 2011, : 689 - 697
  • [23] How does the digital economy affect the urban-rural income gap? Evidence from Chinese cities
    Shen, Caiting
    Wu, Xinyan
    Shi, Linna
    Wan, Yuanyuan
    Hao, Zhijuan
    Ding, Jinmei
    Wen, Qi
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 157
  • [24] A Study of the Basic Public Service Equalization in Urban and Rural Areas in China from Perspective of Harmonious Society
    Luo Da-yu
    Yang Lu-ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (8TH), VOL II, 2012, : 332 - 339
  • [25] Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Urban Patent Quality: Evidence From China Prefectural Cities
    Jiang, Renai
    Hu, Shurui
    Su, Zulong
    Huang, Yincheng
    Zhang, Huiwen
    SAGE OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [26] Does energy transition help narrow the urban-rural income gap? Evidence from China
    Gao, Shuaizhi
    Zhou, Peng
    Zhang, Hongyan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 182
  • [27] Can New-Type Urbanization Construction Narrow the Urban-Rural Income Gap? Evidence from China
    Liu, Jiamin
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Jia, Wenli
    Zhang, Sisi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [28] Urban expansion and the urban-rural income gap: Empirical evidence from China
    Zhong, Sujuan
    Wang, Mingshu
    Zhu, Yi
    Chen, Zhigang
    Huang, Xianjin
    CITIES, 2022, 129
  • [29] Does the development zone promote population urbanization? Evidence from China
    Xi, Qiangmin
    Ji, Peng
    LAND USE POLICY, 2023, 131
  • [30] Internet Development and Urban-Rural Consumption Inequality: Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Zhu, Jian
    Li, Zifang
    Wang, Hui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)