Effects of writing instruction on the reading outcomes of students with literacy difficulties in pre-kindergarten to fifth grade: a meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Shanahan, Emma [1 ,4 ]
Reno, Emily [2 ]
Chandler, Brennan W. [1 ,4 ]
Novelli, Christina [3 ]
An, Jechun [2 ]
Choi, Seohyeon [2 ]
Mcmaster, Kristen L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Meadows Ctr Preventing Educ Risk, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept Educ Psychol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Commun Sci & Special Educ, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Special Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Writing; Instruction; Literacy; Preschool; Elementary school; Meta-analysis; ROBUST VARIANCE-ESTIMATION; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; SPELLING INSTRUCTION; AT-RISK; INTERVENTION; CHILDREN; SKILLS; DISABILITIES; 1ST-GRADE; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1007/s11145-024-10527-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although writing instruction can positively impact reading for students across grades and levels of literacy, the extent to which these findings generalize to young students with literacy difficulties is unclear due to the dynamic nature of reading-writing relations. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of writing instruction on the reading outcomes of students in grades pre-K-5 who have reading, writing, or co-occurring reading and writing difficulties. Across 19 studies and 72 effects, writing instruction had a positive effect on reading outcomes in English (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.13, 0.41], p < .01). Descriptively different subset effects for higher-intensity instruction (small student group, greater total hours) could not be reliably estimated. Effects were moderated by the focus of instruction, with transcription instruction associated with larger effects. Percentage of instructional time spent writing and type of comparison condition (reading treatment or control) did not moderate effects. Implications for the design of early writing interventions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 650
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条