Clinical assessment of a novel machine-learning automated contouring tool for radiotherapy planning

被引:6
|
作者
Hu, Yunfei [1 ]
Nguyen, Huong [2 ]
Smith, Claire [2 ]
Chen, Tom [3 ]
Byrne, Mikel [4 ]
Archibald-Heeren, Ben [1 ]
Rijken, James [5 ]
Aland, Trent [2 ]
机构
[1] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Icon Canc Ctr Concord, Rusty Priest Bldg, Concord, NSW, Australia
[2] ICON Core Off, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Canc Care Ctr Mater Private Hosp, Icon Canc Ctr Springfield, 30 Hlth Care Dr, Springfield, Qld, Australia
[4] Sydney Adventist Hosp, Icon Canc Ctr Wahroonga, Sydney, Australia
[5] Icon Canc Ctr Windsor Gardens, Windsor Gardens, SA, Australia
来源
关键词
automated contouring; efficiency and quality; machine learning; radiotherapy planning; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; SEGMENTATION; DELINEATION; PROSTATE; AUTOSEGMENTATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SOFTWARE; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13949
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Contouring has become an increasingly important aspect of radiotherapy due to inverse planning. Several studies have suggested that the clinical implementation of automated contouring tools can reduce inter-observer variation while increasing contouring efficiency, thereby improving the quality of radiotherapy treatment and reducing the time between simulation and treatment. In this study, a novel, commercial automated contouring tool based on machine learning, the AI-Rad Companion Organs RT (TM) (AI-Rad) software (Version VA31) (Siemens Healthineers, Munich, Germany), was assessed against both manually delineated contours and another commercially available automated contouring software, Varian Smart Segmentation (TM) (SS) (Version 16.0) (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, United States). The quality of contours generated by AI-Rad in Head and Neck (H&N), Thorax, Breast, Male Pelvis (Pelvis_M), and Female Pelvis (Pevis_F) anatomical areas was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively using several metrics. A timing analysis was subsequently performed to explore potential time savings achieved by AI-Rad. Results showed that most automated contours generated by AI-Rad were not only clinically acceptable and required minimal editing, but also superior in quality to contours generated by SS in multiple structures. In addition, timing analysis favored AI-Rad over manual contouring, indicating the largest time saving (753s per patient) in the Thorax area. AI-Rad was concluded to be a promising automated contouring solution that generated clinically acceptable contours and achieved time savings, thereby greatly benefiting the radiotherapy process.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Clinical Tool for Automated Flow Cytometry Based on Machine Learning Methods
    Takenga, Claude
    Dworzak, Michael
    Diem, Markus
    Berndt, Rolf-Dietrich
    Si, Erling
    Brandstoetter, Michael
    Karawajew, Leonid
    Gau, Melanie
    Kampel, Martin
    BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, IWBBIO 2017, PT II, 2017, 10209 : 537 - 548
  • [22] Deep learning-based automated liver contouring using a small sample of radiotherapy planning computed tomography images
    Arjmandi, N.
    Momennezhad, M.
    Arastouei, S.
    Mosleh-Shirazi, M. A.
    Albawi, A.
    Pishevar, Z.
    Nasseri, S.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (05) : 1442 - 1450
  • [23] Validation of an automated contouring and treatment planning tool for pediatric craniospinal radiation therapy
    Hernandez, Soleil
    Burger, Hester
    Nguyen, Callistus
    Paulino, Arnold C.
    Lucas, John T.
    Faught, Austin M.
    Duryea, Jack
    Netherton, Tucker
    Rhee, Dong Joo
    Cardenas, Carlos
    Howell, Rebecca
    Fuentes, David
    Pollard-Larkin, Julianne
    Court, Laurence
    Parkes, Jeannette
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [24] Machine Learning for Automated Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy
    El Naqa, I.
    DeMarco, J.
    Al-Hallaq, H.
    Booth, J.
    Ritter, T.
    Kim, G.
    Park, S.
    Popple, R.
    Perez, M.
    Farrey, K.
    Moran, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3159 - 3159
  • [25] Rapid Radiotherapy Contouring Practice: Pilot Study of a Novel Web-Based Tool Enabling Automated Individualized Feedback
    Duke, S. L.
    Tan, L. T.
    Eminowicz, G.
    Park, W. H. E.
    Wharrad, H.
    Patel, R.
    Doody, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E147 - E147
  • [26] Automated contouring and planning pipeline for hippocampal-avoidant whole-brain radiotherapy
    Feng, Christine H.
    Cornell, Mariel
    Moore, Kevin L.
    Karunamuni, Roshan
    Seibert, Tyler M.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [27] Clinical Outcomes for Standard of Care Machine Learning Prostate Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
    Winter, J.
    Conroy, L.
    Ramotar, M.
    Santiago, A. T.
    Catton, C.
    Chung, P.
    McIntosh, C.
    Purdie, T. G.
    Berlin, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : S19 - S19
  • [28] Automated contouring and planning pipeline for hippocampal-avoidant whole-brain radiotherapy
    Christine H. Feng
    Mariel Cornell
    Kevin L. Moore
    Roshan Karunamuni
    Tyler M. Seibert
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [29] A Machine-Learning Algorithm to Optimise Automated Adverse Drug Reaction Detection from Clinical Coding
    Christopher McMaster
    David Liew
    Claire Keith
    Parnaz Aminian
    Albert Frauman
    Drug Safety, 2019, 42 : 721 - 725
  • [30] Performance Evaluation of An Atlas-Based Machine Learning Approach for Automated Prostate Radiotherapy Planning
    Conroy, L.
    McIntosh, C.
    Berlin, A.
    Tjong, M.
    Chung, P.
    Craig, T.
    Purdie, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E399 - E399