Vaginal birth after cesarean score for the prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean section - A prospective observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Varun, Neha [1 ]
Nigam, Aruna [2 ]
Gupta, Nidhi [2 ]
Mazhari, Farhat [2 ]
Kashyap, Varun [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi, India
[2] Hamdard Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi, India
[3] Hamdard Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Prevent & Social Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Lower-segment cesarean section; scoring; trial of labor; vaginal birth after cesarean; TRIAL; LABOR;
D O I
10.4103/injms.injms_77_22
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographic and obstetrical factors affecting the chances of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery and to develop a scoring system for the prediction of same. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective observational study done over a period of 1 year. A total of 100 term pregnant women with previous one lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS) fulfilling the criteria for a trial of labor were recruited for the study. As 23 patients refused to undergo trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in early labor, 77 women formed the study group. Parameters assessed to predict successful TOLAC were maternal age, body mass index (BMI), history of prior vaginal delivery, interdelivery interval, indication of previous cesarean section, gestational age, type of labor, Bishop's score, and expected baby weight. Scores 0-2 were given, and the mean score obtained was correlated with the outcome of TOLAC. Results: Successful vaginal delivery occurred in 57.14% (44/77) of women. BMI <= 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.004), parity <= 3 (P = 0.005), Bishop's score > 4 (P = 0.000), spontaneous onset of labor at the time of admission (P = 0.001), and nonrecurrent indication of previous LSCS (P = 0.029) were found to be significantly associated with the VBAC. The probability of having a successful VBAC was 83.3% and 100%, with the VBAC score value of more than 18 and 20, respectively. Conclusion: The mean VBAC score of 18-20 by the current scoring system is beneficial in predicting the outcome. This can help in counseling the patient, relatives as well as health professionals to undergo labor trial to decrease the cesarean section rate in the current era.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Cohort Study
    Tessmer-Tuck, Jennifer A.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Racek, Adrianne R.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    Wick, Myra J.
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2014, 77 (02) : 121 - 126
  • [22] Vaginal birth after cesarean section prediction model for Jordanian population
    Awawdeh, Shatha
    Rawashdeh, Hasan
    Aljalodi, Haneen
    Abu Shamleh, Rafeef
    Alshorman, Sumyah
    COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 104
  • [23] The Development of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section (VBAC)
    Frimer, Leora
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 176S - 176S
  • [24] VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - REPLY
    FLAMM, BL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 160 (05) : 1251 - 1251
  • [25] Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Cameron, CA
    Roberts, CL
    Peat, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (03) : 267 - 269
  • [26] PROMOTING VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    CLEMENSON, N
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1993, 47 (01) : 139 - 144
  • [27] VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION
    SEMCHYSHYN, S
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1991, 144 (06) : 632 - 632
  • [28] Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation
    Miller, DA
    Mullin, P
    Hou, D
    Paul, RH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [29] Brief history of vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Cohen, B
    Atkins, M
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 44 (03): : 604 - 608
  • [30] Vaginal birth after one previous cesarean section
    Birgisdottir, Brynhildur Tinna
    Haroardottir, Hildur
    Bjarnadottir, Ragnheiour I.
    Porkelsson, Porour
    LAEKNABLADID, 2008, 94 (09): : 591 - 597