Barriers for Participation in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Qualitative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Phillipsen, Sofie [1 ]
Weltz, Louise Kongsmark [1 ]
Dressler, Jannie [2 ]
Nielsen, Marie Konge [3 ,4 ]
Rasmussen, Morten [2 ]
Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad [2 ]
Johnsen, Anna Thit [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, JB Winslovs Vej 19-3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Digest Dis Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, User Perspect & Community Based Intervent, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Coll Absalon, Dept Nursing, Slagelse, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Psychol, Odense, Denmark
[6] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol & Palliat Care, Roskilde, Denmark
[7] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol & Palliat Care, Naestved, Denmark
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Barriers; Qualitative study; NONPARTICIPATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s12029-022-00876-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The participation rate in the Danish National Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer is around 60%. Since early detection of cancer through the colorectal cancer screening program (CRCS) reduces mortality rates, it is important to understand why people do not participate. The aim of this study was therefore to examine in depth why some people do not participate in the Danish CRCS program. Methods Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 people who had not participated in the national CRCS program. Data was analyzed using an inductive hermeneutic approach. Results The analysis uncovered three main themes describing barriers to screening: (a) the accountability for ensuring personal health covered the following sub-themes: (i) when invitation is out of sight it is out of mind, (ii) aversion against own stool sample collection, and (iii) the perceived risk of getting colorectal cancer (CRC); (b) attitudes towards the healthcare system and its organization covered the following sub-themes: (i) positivity towards CRCS, (ii) trust in the healthcare system, (iii) lack of internal communication in the healthcare system, and (iv) wish for involvement of the general practitioner (GP); (c) knowledge about disease and screening covered the following sub-themes: (i) knowledge about CRC and CRCS, (ii) wish for information via new channels, and (iii) CRC is rarely something you talk about. Conclusion Among the informants included in this study, lack of participation in the CRCS program was not due to an active opt-out, as most informants had intentions of participating. The informants thought it would motivate them to participate if their GP would remind them of the screening program.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 881
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vietnamese Americans: A Qualitative Analysis
    Kimura, Amanda
    Sin, Mo-Kyung
    Spigner, Clarence
    Tran, Anh
    Tu, Shin-Ping
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2014, 29 (04) : 728 - 734
  • [32] A risk prediction tool for colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study of patient and provider facilitators and barriers
    Matthias, Marianne S.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [33] A qualitative study of barriers and enablers associated with colorectal cancer screening among Somali men in Minnesota
    Rogers, Charles R.
    Obidike, Ogechi Jessica
    Wallington, Sherrie F.
    Hussein, Musse
    Mahamed, Zahra A.
    Sampson, Jill
    ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2021, 26 (02) : 168 - 185
  • [34] Filipinos' attitudes, barriers, and enablers on colorectal cancer screening: Insights from a qualitative research study
    Khalil, Carine
    Chaplin, Antwon
    Esmundo, Shenazar
    Crochetiere, Austin
    Almario, Christopher, V
    CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 33
  • [35] AmI different? A qualitative study on barriers to colorectal cancer screening in patients with chronic mental illnesses
    Aggarwal, A.
    Pandurangi, A.
    Scherer, M.
    Kuzel, A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 : 245 - 246
  • [36] A risk prediction tool for colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study of patient and provider facilitators and barriers
    Marianne S. Matthias
    Thomas F. Imperiale
    BMC Family Practice, 21
  • [37] Time to colonoscopy, cancer probability, and precursor lesions in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Zimmermann-Nielsen, Erik
    Buijs, Magdalena Maria
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 11 : 659 - 667
  • [38] Self-reported barriers to participation in Lung Cancer Screening: a qualitative review
    Hemmington, Amy
    Naidu, Sindhu Bhaarrati
    Patrick, Tanya
    Bhamani, Amyn
    Robinson, Paul
    Blair, Kameka
    Bojang, Fanta
    Patel, Shivani
    Nair, Arjun
    Thakrar, Ricky
    Navani, Neal
    Janes, Sam
    LUNG CANCER, 2025, 200
  • [39] Barriers to Cancer Screening among Medical Aid Program Recipients in the Republic of Korea: A Qualitative Study
    Lee, Yoon Young
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Suh, Mina
    Park, BoYoung
    Kim, Yeol
    Choi, Kui Son
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (02) : 589 - 594
  • [40] A Qualitative Study of Enablers and Barriers to Participation and Retention in Cancer Research
    Narsavage, G. L.
    Petitte, T.
    Nichols, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199