Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference following cervical disc replacement

被引:7
|
作者
Mai, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Shahi, Pratyush [1 ]
Lee, Ryan [1 ]
Shinn, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Vaishnav, Avani [1 ]
Araghi, Kasra [1 ]
Singh, Nishtha [1 ]
Maayan, Omri [1 ,2 ]
Tuma, Olivia C. [1 ]
Pajak, Anthony [1 ]
Asada, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Korsun, Maximilian K. [1 ]
Singh, Sumedha [1 ]
Kim, Yeo Eun [1 ,2 ]
Louie, Philip K. [1 ]
Huang, Russel C. [1 ]
Albert, Todd J. [1 ]
Dowdell, James [1 ]
Sheha, Evan D. [1 ]
Iyer, Sravisht [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Spine Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Spine Surg, 545 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2023年 / 23卷 / 12期
关键词
Cervical disc replacement; Minimal clinically important difference; Neck disability index; Patient reported out-come measures; Visual analog scale; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; NECK PAIN; DISKECTOMY; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; SPINE; RADICULOPATHY; MYELOPATHY; DISABILITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been emerging as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathology, not all patients undergoing CDR will achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively-risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in PROMs following CDR have not been established.PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in Neck Disability Index (NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm following primary 1-or 2-level CDRs in the early and late postoperative periods.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who had undergone primary 1-or 2-level CDR for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks between 2017 and 2022.OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI), Visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm, MCID.METHODS: Minimal clinically important difference achievement rates for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm within early (within 3 months) and late (6 months to 2 years) postoperative periods were assessed based on previously established thresholds. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for each PROM and evaluation period, with failure to achieve MCID assigned as the outcome variable, to establish models to identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID and predictors for achievement of MCID. Predictor variables included in the analyses featured demographics, comorbidities, diagnoses/symptoms, and perioperative characteristics.RESULTS: A total of 154 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients achieved MCID for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm for both early and late postoperative periods-79% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the early postoperative period, while 80% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the late postoperative period. Predominant neck pain was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for NDI in the early (OR: 3.13 [1.10-8.87], p-value: .032) and late (OR: 5.01 [1.31-19.12], p-value: .018) postoperative periods, and VAS-Arm for the late postoperative period (OR: 36.63 [3.78-354.56], p-value: .002). Myelopathy was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the early postoperative period (OR: 3.40 [1.08-10.66], p-value: .036). Anxiety was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the late postoperative period (OR: 6.51 [1.91-22.18], p-value: .003). CDR at levels C5C7 was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID in NDI for the late postoperative period (OR: 9.74 [1.43-66.34], p-value: .020).CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified several risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in common PROMs following CDR including predominant neck pain, myelopathy, anxiety, and CDR at levels C5 -C7. These findings may help inform the approach to counseling patients on outcomes of CDR as the evidence suggests that those with the risk factors above may not improve as reliably after CDR. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1808 / 1816
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Correction Surgery in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Yuan, Lei
    Zeng, Yan
    Chen, Zhongqiang
    Li, Weishi
    Zhang, Xinling
    Ni, Jiajun
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (24) : E1669 - E1676
  • [12] Minimal clinically important difference: The basics
    Salas Apaza, Julieta Aldana
    Ariel Franco, Juan Victor
    Meza, Nicolas
    Madrid, Eva
    Loezar, Cristobal
    Garegnani, Luis
    MEDWAVE, 2021, 21 (03):
  • [13] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: Response
    Franceschini, Marco
    Boffa, Angelo
    Pignotti, Elettra
    Andriolo, Luca
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Filardo, Giuseppe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (13): : NP52 - NP52
  • [14] Histopathologic degenerative score as a predictor of minimal clinically important difference in pain and functionality following surgical treatment for disc herniation
    Beculic, Hakija
    Begagic, Emir
    Segalo, Sabina
    Jukovic-Bihorac, Fatima
    Papic, Emsel
    Pugonja, Ragib
    Dzidic-Krivic, Amina
    Nuhovic, Adem
    Lakicevic, Goran
    Vranic, Semir
    Pojskic, Mirza
    BIOMOLECULES AND BIOMEDICINE, 2024,
  • [15] Histopathologic degenerative score as a predictor of minimal clinically important difference in pain and functionality following surgical treatment for disc herniation
    Becilic, Hakija
    Begagic, Emir
    Segalo, Sabina
    Jukovic-Bihorac, Fatima
    Papic, Emsel
    Pugonja, Ragib
    Dzidic-Krivic, Amina
    Nuhovic, Adem
    Lakicevic, Goran
    Vranic, Semir
    Pojskic, Mirza
    BIOMOLECULES AND BIOMEDICINE, 2025, 25 (03): : 623 - 631
  • [16] Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01): : E92 - E97
  • [17] Time required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference after open proximal hamstring repair
    White, Alexander E.
    Varady, Nathan H.
    Itthipanichpong, Thun
    Menta, Samarth, V
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    JOURNAL OF HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY, 2025,
  • [18] Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Pediatric
    Esmaeilinezhad, Zahra
    Rigsby, Michelle
    Zoghi, Behbood
    Ball, Geoff
    Johnston, Bradley
    OBESITY, 2023, 31 : 122 - 122
  • [19] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada, M.
    Bilbao, A.
    Ansola, L.
    Quirs, R.
    Garcia-Perez, L.
    Navarro, G.
    Escobar, A.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [20] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
    M. Gonzalez-Saenz de Tejada
    A. Bilbao
    L. Ansola
    R. Quirós
    L. García-Perez
    G. Navarro
    A. Escobar
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17