Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference following cervical disc replacement

被引:7
|
作者
Mai, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Shahi, Pratyush [1 ]
Lee, Ryan [1 ]
Shinn, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Vaishnav, Avani [1 ]
Araghi, Kasra [1 ]
Singh, Nishtha [1 ]
Maayan, Omri [1 ,2 ]
Tuma, Olivia C. [1 ]
Pajak, Anthony [1 ]
Asada, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Korsun, Maximilian K. [1 ]
Singh, Sumedha [1 ]
Kim, Yeo Eun [1 ,2 ]
Louie, Philip K. [1 ]
Huang, Russel C. [1 ]
Albert, Todd J. [1 ]
Dowdell, James [1 ]
Sheha, Evan D. [1 ]
Iyer, Sravisht [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Spine Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Spine Surg, 545 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2023年 / 23卷 / 12期
关键词
Cervical disc replacement; Minimal clinically important difference; Neck disability index; Patient reported out-come measures; Visual analog scale; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; NECK PAIN; DISKECTOMY; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; SPINE; RADICULOPATHY; MYELOPATHY; DISABILITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been emerging as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathology, not all patients undergoing CDR will achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively-risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in PROMs following CDR have not been established.PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in Neck Disability Index (NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm following primary 1-or 2-level CDRs in the early and late postoperative periods.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who had undergone primary 1-or 2-level CDR for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks between 2017 and 2022.OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI), Visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm, MCID.METHODS: Minimal clinically important difference achievement rates for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm within early (within 3 months) and late (6 months to 2 years) postoperative periods were assessed based on previously established thresholds. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for each PROM and evaluation period, with failure to achieve MCID assigned as the outcome variable, to establish models to identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID and predictors for achievement of MCID. Predictor variables included in the analyses featured demographics, comorbidities, diagnoses/symptoms, and perioperative characteristics.RESULTS: A total of 154 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients achieved MCID for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm for both early and late postoperative periods-79% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the early postoperative period, while 80% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the late postoperative period. Predominant neck pain was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for NDI in the early (OR: 3.13 [1.10-8.87], p-value: .032) and late (OR: 5.01 [1.31-19.12], p-value: .018) postoperative periods, and VAS-Arm for the late postoperative period (OR: 36.63 [3.78-354.56], p-value: .002). Myelopathy was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the early postoperative period (OR: 3.40 [1.08-10.66], p-value: .036). Anxiety was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the late postoperative period (OR: 6.51 [1.91-22.18], p-value: .003). CDR at levels C5C7 was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID in NDI for the late postoperative period (OR: 9.74 [1.43-66.34], p-value: .020).CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified several risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in common PROMs following CDR including predominant neck pain, myelopathy, anxiety, and CDR at levels C5 -C7. These findings may help inform the approach to counseling patients on outcomes of CDR as the evidence suggests that those with the risk factors above may not improve as reliably after CDR. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1808 / 1816
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Patel, Dil V.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 13 (03): : 262 - 269
  • [2] Differences in Time to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 176 : E337 - E344
  • [3] What are the common factors that lead to the failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference after shoulder surgery? A scoping review
    Kerhoulas, Zoe
    Ojaghi, Reza
    Hayes, Emmitt
    Khoury, Jason
    Pollock, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (04): : 1749 - 1755
  • [4] What are the common factors that lead to the failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference after shoulder surgery? A scoping review
    Zoe Kerhoulas
    Reza Ojaghi
    Emmitt Hayes
    Jason Khoury
    J. Pollock
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 : 1749 - 1755
  • [5] Risk Factors for Failing to Reach a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (01): : 51 - +
  • [6] Clinicoradiological Risk Factors Associated with Inability to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Operated Cases of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Acharya, Shankar
    Khanna, Varun
    Chahal, Rupinder Singh
    Kalra, Kashmiri Lal
    Vishwakarma, Gayatri
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (05) : 904 - 915
  • [7] Obesity Increases Risk of Failure to Achieve the 1-Year PROMIS PF-10a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Katakam, Akhil
    Collins, Austin K.
    Sauder, Nicholas
    Shin, David
    Bragdon, Charles R.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    Bedair, Hany S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : S184 - S191
  • [8] Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Mayer, Tom G.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1739 - 1743
  • [9] Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference and significant clinical benefit in PROMIS computer adaptive test domains in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair
    Tramer, Joseph S.
    Yedulla, Nikhil R.
    Ziedas, Alexander C.
    Patel, Mit
    Franovic, Sreten
    Muh, Stephanie J.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (07) : 1416 - 1425
  • [10] The minimal clinically important difference in the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire
    Maldonado-Puebla, Martin
    Ledford, Dennis
    Cardet, Juan Carlos
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 133 (02) : 123 - 124