A comparative study of self-centering precast concrete walls with replaceable buckling-restrained yielding plates or friction dissipation components

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Xinghua [1 ]
Kurama, Yahya C. [2 ]
Wu, Gang [1 ]
Cui, Haoran [3 ,4 ]
Tang, Yuchuan [1 ]
Zeng, Yihua [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] China Construction Engn Div Co Ltd, Zhengzhou 450004, Peoples R China
[4] China State Construction Engn Corp Ltd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Buckling -restrained plates; Friction; Self; -centering; Precast structural walls; Cyclic loading test; Finite element model; Parameter study; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SHEAR WALLS; BEHAVIOR; ROCKING; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115539
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two new unbonded post-tensioned (PT) self-centering precast concrete wall systems with excellent reparability and seismic resilience are investigated in this paper through cyclic loading testing of four large-scale precast walls. As major innovative features, reparability and seismic resilience of the structures are achieved by using externally connected replaceable buckling-restrained yielding plates (Type I) or friction components (Type II), and steel jackets to confine concrete at wall toes. Both types of wall specimens showed excellent self-centering, energy dissipation, and ductile behavior over 3.5-4% lateral drift without significant strength reduction, demonstrating remarkable advantages over monolithic cast-in-place (CIP) walls and self-centering precast concrete walls with yielding reinforcing bars. The damage in the proposed walls concentrated in the external energy dissipation components, with minor concrete cracking and no concrete crushing at the completion of testing, making repairs feasible by replacing the damaged components. The energy dissipating capacity for the Type II wall was significantly greater than those for the Type I walls at relatively small drift levels due to the large initial stiffness of friction-based damping. As there was no significant damage in the friction damping components throughout testing, the energy dissipation for the Type II wall was much more stable than those for the Type I walls. Comprehensive finite element models were also developed for both types of walls, which satisfactorily captured the global and local behaviors, including prediction of minor concrete damage, steel and concrete strains, and nonlinear behavior of the energy dissipation components. A parameter study was subsequently conducted to investigate the effects of losses in the friction bolt force and PT force on the wall behavior. Overall, both types of walls can be used in the life-line structures that have great demand for fast reparation and restoration of their original lateral resistance and energy dissipation after a major earthquake.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analytical and numerical study on the cyclic behavior of buckling-restrained SMA-based self-centering damper
    Qiu, Canxing
    Liu, Jiawang
    Du, Xiuli
    SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 30 (09)
  • [32] Experimental study on progressive collapse of self-centering precast concrete frame with infill walls
    Li, Shuang
    Wang, Haoran
    Liu, Haopeng
    Shan, Sidi
    Zhai, Changhai
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 294
  • [33] Research on seismic behavior of precast self-centering concrete walls with dry slip-friction connectors
    Du, Xiuli
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Liu, Hongtao
    Liu, Minmin
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 42
  • [34] Comparative seismic fragility assessment of buckling restrained and self-centering (friction spring and SMA) braced frames
    Issa, Anas
    Alam, M. Shahria
    SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 29 (05)
  • [35] Experimental study of precast concrete walls with replaceable corner components
    Cheng, Xiaowei
    Dong, Xiaowei
    Li, Yi
    Lu, Xinzheng
    Du, Xiuli
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (14): : 4352 - 4375
  • [36] Seismic responses of multistory buildings with self-centering buckling-restrained braces: Influence of the pretension force
    Qing, Yuan
    Wang, Chun-Lin
    Zhou, Zhen
    Zeng, Bin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 238
  • [37] Hysteretic Performance of Disc Spring-Steel Tendon Self-centering Buckling-restrained Brace
    Lu, Junkai
    Dai, Shoukun
    Xu, Guoshan
    Li, Wenpeng
    Li, Jinping
    Li, Yifei
    Xu, Xingzhe
    Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 2024, 51 (07): : 83 - 94
  • [38] Seismic assessment of glulam frames with dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces
    Wang, Xijun
    Li, Zheng
    Xie, Puyue
    He, Minjuan
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 97
  • [39] Behavior test and restoring forcemodel of disc-spring self-centering buckling-restrained braces
    Han Q.
    Jia Z.-L.
    Wang X.-Q.
    Huang C.
    Han, Qiang (qhan@bjut.edu.cn), 2018, Tsinghua University (35): : 144 - 150
  • [40] Analysis and experimental testing of a self-centering controlled rocking wall with buckling-restrained braces at base
    Jiang, Qing
    Wang, Hanqin
    Feng, Yulong
    Chong, Xun
    Huang, Junqi
    Wang, Shaoying
    Zhou, Yating
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 269