A comparative study of self-centering precast concrete walls with replaceable buckling-restrained yielding plates or friction dissipation components

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Xinghua [1 ]
Kurama, Yahya C. [2 ]
Wu, Gang [1 ]
Cui, Haoran [3 ,4 ]
Tang, Yuchuan [1 ]
Zeng, Yihua [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] China Construction Engn Div Co Ltd, Zhengzhou 450004, Peoples R China
[4] China State Construction Engn Corp Ltd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Buckling -restrained plates; Friction; Self; -centering; Precast structural walls; Cyclic loading test; Finite element model; Parameter study; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SHEAR WALLS; BEHAVIOR; ROCKING; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115539
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two new unbonded post-tensioned (PT) self-centering precast concrete wall systems with excellent reparability and seismic resilience are investigated in this paper through cyclic loading testing of four large-scale precast walls. As major innovative features, reparability and seismic resilience of the structures are achieved by using externally connected replaceable buckling-restrained yielding plates (Type I) or friction components (Type II), and steel jackets to confine concrete at wall toes. Both types of wall specimens showed excellent self-centering, energy dissipation, and ductile behavior over 3.5-4% lateral drift without significant strength reduction, demonstrating remarkable advantages over monolithic cast-in-place (CIP) walls and self-centering precast concrete walls with yielding reinforcing bars. The damage in the proposed walls concentrated in the external energy dissipation components, with minor concrete cracking and no concrete crushing at the completion of testing, making repairs feasible by replacing the damaged components. The energy dissipating capacity for the Type II wall was significantly greater than those for the Type I walls at relatively small drift levels due to the large initial stiffness of friction-based damping. As there was no significant damage in the friction damping components throughout testing, the energy dissipation for the Type II wall was much more stable than those for the Type I walls. Comprehensive finite element models were also developed for both types of walls, which satisfactorily captured the global and local behaviors, including prediction of minor concrete damage, steel and concrete strains, and nonlinear behavior of the energy dissipation components. A parameter study was subsequently conducted to investigate the effects of losses in the friction bolt force and PT force on the wall behavior. Overall, both types of walls can be used in the life-line structures that have great demand for fast reparation and restoration of their original lateral resistance and energy dissipation after a major earthquake.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-centering Buckling-restrained Braces
    Liu, Lu
    Wu, Bin
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 639-640 : 846 - 849
  • [2] Behavior of self-centering buckling-restrained braces
    Miller, D. J.
    Fahnestock, L. A.
    Eatherton, M. R.
    STESSA 2012: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, 2012, : 685 - 690
  • [3] Hysteretic performance of self-centering buckling-restrained braces with embedded friction spring
    Chen, Lei
    Wang, Dongsheng
    Shi, Fan
    Zhang, Rui
    Sun, Zhiguo
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 280
  • [4] Experimental study of precast self-centering concrete shear walls with external friction dampers
    Liu, Yang
    Zhou, Wei
    Xie, Xinying
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 68
  • [5] Experimental investigation of the hysteretic performance of self-centering buckling-restrained braces with friction fuses
    Xie, Qin
    Zhou, Zhen
    Meng, Shao-Ping
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 203
  • [6] Hysteretic Behavior of Assembled Self-Centering Buckling-Restrained Brace
    Zhang C.
    Guo X.
    Zhu S.
    Gao S.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2021, 49 (01): : 8 - 19
  • [7] Cyclic tests of novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace
    Wu, B. (bin.wu@hit.edu.cn), 1600, Southeast University (42):
  • [8] Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance
    Eatherton, Matthew R.
    Fahnestock, Larry A.
    Miller, David J.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (13): : 1897 - 1914
  • [9] Development of a Compression-Only Self-Centering Brace with Buckling-Restrained Bars for Energy Dissipation
    Chou, Chung-Che
    Hon, Jing-Fu
    Bai, Bing-Ye
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (09)
  • [10] Experimental study on seismic behavior of the self-centering RCS joint with replaceable buckling restrained dampers
    Yang, Yiming
    Yang, Pu
    Shu, Yuan
    Shen, PeiWen
    Eatherton, Matthew R.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 261