Competitive pressure from peers, firm sizes and firms' risk-taking behaviours: machine learning evidence

被引:2
|
作者
Tian, Jinfang [1 ]
Meng, Xiaofan [1 ]
Li, Lee [2 ]
Cao, Wei [3 ]
Xue, Rui [4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Res Ctr Stat & Interdisciplinary Sci, Sch Stat & Math, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] York Univ, Sch Adm Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Competitive pressure; Risk-taking; Firm sizes; Machine learning; INVESTMENT; INFORMATION; RESILIENCE; MOTIVATION; OWNERSHIP; ADVANTAGE; RESOURCES; AWARENESS; SEEKING; RIVALRY;
D O I
10.1108/JAL-11-2023-0202
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to investigate how firms of different sizes respond to competitive pressure from peers.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs machine learning techniques to measure competitive pressure based on management discussion and analysis (MD&A) documents and then utilises the constructed pressure indicator to explore the relationship between competitive pressure and corporate risk-taking behaviours amongst firms of different sizes.FindingsWe find that firm sizes are positively associated with their risk-taking behaviours when firms respond to competitive pressure. Large firms are inclined to exhibit a high level of risk-taking behaviours, whereas small firms tend to make conservative decisions. Regional growth potential and institutional ownership moderate the relationships.Originality/valueUtilising text mining techniques, this study constructs a novel quantitative indicator to measure competitive pressure perceived by focal firms and demonstrates the heterogeneous behaviour of firms of different sizes in response to competitive pressure from peers, advancing research on competitive market pressures.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ownership concentration, corporate risk-taking and performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms
    Tran, Nam Hoai
    Le, Chi Dat
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [22] Pyramidal structure, risk-taking and firm value: Evidence from Chinese local SOEs
    Su, Kun
    Wan, Rui
    Song, Victor Y.
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2018, 26 (03) : 401 - 427
  • [23] Differential Impact of Uncertainty on Exporting Decision in Risk-averse and Risk-taking Firms: Evidence from Korean Firms
    Kim, Haeng-Sun
    SEOUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 29 (03) : 379 - 409
  • [24] Multiple Large Shareholders and Corporate Risk-taking: Evidence from French Family Firms
    Boubaker, Sabri
    Nguyen, Pascal
    Rouatbi, Wael
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 22 (04) : 697 - 745
  • [25] Media sentiment and corporate risk-taking — Evidence based on machine learning and text analysis
    Gong X.
    Xu X.
    Xiong X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2024, 44 (06): : 1869 - 1895
  • [26] Risk-taking Begets Risk-taking: Evidence from Casino Openings and Investor Portfolios
    Liao, Chi
    FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2023, 58 (01) : 143 - 165
  • [27] Background risk and risk-taking - evidence from the field
    Kleemann, Linda
    Riekhof, Marie-Catherine
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2023, 28 (03) : 265 - 284
  • [28] Religiosity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Islam
    Aldhehayan, Abdulaziz
    Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2023, 20 (05) : 473 - 498
  • [29] Opacity and risk-taking: Evidence from Norway
    Cao, Jin
    Juelsrud, Ragnar E.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 134
  • [30] Role of Institutional Owners in Devising Firms' Risk-Taking Behavior: Evidence From a Developing Economy
    Nazir, Mian Sajid
    Nazir, Sadaf
    Javaid, Aisha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 7 (04) : 21 - 36