How to engage patients in computerized cognitive training: a cognitive rehabilitation expert's perspective

被引:1
|
作者
Nahas, Christelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gandit, Marc [2 ]
Quillion-Dupre, Lisa [2 ]
Monfort, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, TIMC Lab, Grenoble INP, CNRS,UMR 5525,VetAgro Sup, Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, LIP PC2S, EA 4145, Grenoble, France
[3] COVIRTUA Healthcare, Colomiers, France
[4] Univ Grenoble Alpes, TIMC Lab, Rond Point Croix Vie Domaine Merci Tronche, F-38706 Grenoble, France
关键词
Computerized cognitive training; engagement; acceptability; usability; neurocognitive disorders; WORKING-MEMORY; OLDER-ADULTS; INTELLIGENCE; BRAIN; DEMENTIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/17483107.2023.2284879
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeThe relationship between a patient and their therapist plays a crucial role in patient engagement. While Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) may assist in preserving cognitive skills in cases of aging, dementia or acquired brain injuries, its effectiveness has not been definitively proven. Improving user engagement, acceptance, and software usability could aid in addressing this issue. The present study aims to identify potential obstacles and facilitators by examining the perspectives of rehabilitation professionals on the current usage of CCT software.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 rehabilitation professionals, familiar with a CCT software. The data were transcribed and followed by an independent iterative thematic analysis.ResultsTwo major themes were identified: (1) facilitating factors and (2) difficulties related to use. The main obstacles were difficulties related to the computerized nature of the exercises, technology use, understanding the software and general learning difficulties. The main facilitators were the ecological and novel nature of the exercises, and the adaptability of the difficulty levels.ConclusionThe complexity of the CCT presents challenges for its usage by rehabilitation professionals, which in turn can impede patient utilization as well. To address this issue and promote sustainable use of the software, providing instruction delivery to facilitate learning and understanding of the CCT is essential. Additionally, creating a standardized foundation that therapists can refer to for guidance may also aid in optimizing the software's usage. It is recommended to utilize a model for CCT acceptability and acceptance in developing these solutions to enhance patient engagement. Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) may help sustain cognitive skills or delay its decline due to causes such as aging, dementia or acquired brain injuries.User engagement, user acceptance and software usability could help address these issues.The relationship between a patient and their therapist plays a crucial role in patient engagement.Difficulties related to using and understanding a CCT software could affect behavioral intention/use.Rehabilitation professionals may face difficulties using CCT software, which could in turn, hinder patient utilization.Facilitating learning and understanding of the software through instruction delivery to increase acceptance could respond to the existing obstacles.A model for CCT acceptability/acceptance may be useful for improving the development of these solutions, to optimize patient engagement.Creating a standardized foundation for therapists to refer to could help optimize usage of CCT software.
引用
收藏
页码:2306 / 2318
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Malleability of expectations of computerized cognitive training
    Krzyzanowski, Daniel
    Kusi, Mavis
    Goghari, Vina M.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 196
  • [22] Computerized Training for Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Improvement
    Pappas, Marios A.
    Drigas, Athanasios S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2019, 9 (04): : 50 - 62
  • [23] Rehabilitation with focus on cognitive training
    Lundin, L
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 : 37S - 38S
  • [24] Cognitive stimulation, training, and rehabilitation
    Kurz, Alexander
    DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 21 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [25] Computerized cognitive assessment of patients with cardiac and pulmonary disorders in a rehabilitation setting
    GernertDott, PJ
    Nicholson, NL
    BIOFEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATION, 1996, 21 (04): : 360 - 360
  • [26] DOES COMPUTERIZED COGNITIVE REHABILITATION WORK - A REVIEW
    ROBERTSON, I
    APHASIOLOGY, 1990, 4 (04) : 381 - 405
  • [27] The computerized cognitive training alliance - A proposal for a therapeutic alliance model for home-based computerized cognitive training
    Wilms, Inge L.
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [28] A longitudinal study of computerized cognitive training in stroke patients - effects on cognitive function and white matter
    Nyberg, Claudia Kim
    Nordvik, Jan Egil
    Becker, Frank
    Rohani, Darius A.
    Sederevicius, Donatas
    Fjell, Anders M.
    Walhovd, Kristine B.
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2018, 25 (04) : 241 - 247
  • [29] Effects of computerized cognitive training on functional brain networks in patients with vascular cognitive impairment and no dementia
    Li, Qiong-Ge
    Xing, Yi
    Zhu, Zu-De
    Fei, Xiao-Lu
    Tang, Yi
    Lu, Jie
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 30 (06)
  • [30] Cognitive Rehabilitation: How it is and how it might be
    Wilson, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 3 (05) : 487 - 496