Development of a Choice-framework for Covid vaccines in India using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach

被引:0
|
作者
George, Tarun K. [1 ]
Nair, Nayana P. [2 ]
Singh, Awnish Kumar
Kumar, A. Dilesh [2 ]
Roy, Arup Deb [3 ,4 ]
Mohan, Varshini Neethi [5 ]
Kang, Gagandeep [2 ]
机构
[1] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Gen Med, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept GI Sci, Wellcome Trust Labs, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] MoHFW, NTAGI Secretariat, NIHFW, New Delhi, India
[4] John Snow India, New Delhi 110070, India
[5] Indian Inst Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Covid-19; Vaccines; India; Multicriteria decision analysis; MCDA; Decision making; Healthcare;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.062
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccines were crucial in controlling the Covid-19 pandemic. As more vaccines receive reg-ulatory approval, stakeholders will be faced with several options and must make an appropriate choice for themselves. We proposed a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to guide decision -makers in comparing vaccines for the Indian context. Methods: We adhered to the ISPOR guidance for the MCDA process. Seven vaccine options were com-pared under ten criteria. Through three virtual workshops, we obtained opinions and weights from citi-zens, private-sector hospitals, and public health organisations. Available evidence was rescaled and incorporated into the performance matrix. The final score for each vaccine was calculated for the different groups. We performed different sensitivity analyses to assess the consistency of the rank list. Results: The cost, efficacy and operational score of the vaccines had the highest weights among the stake-holders. From the six scenario groups, Janssen had the highest score in four. This was driven by the advantage of having a single dose of vaccination. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the overall group, Covaxin, Janssen, and Sputnik were the first three options. The participants expressed that avail-ability, WHO approvals and safety, among others, would be crucial when considering vaccines. Conclusions: The MCDA process has not been capitalised on in healthcare decision-making in India and LMICs. Considering the available data and stakeholder preference at the time of the study, Covaxin, Janssen, and Sputnik were preferred options. The choice framework with the dynamic performance matrix is a valuable tool that could be adapted to different population groups and extended based on increasing vaccine options and emerging evidence. *ISPOR - The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:3755 / 3762
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Professor Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Hein, Nelson
    Kroenke, Adriana
    Rodrigues Junior, Moacir Manoel
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2015, 2015, 55 : 539 - 548
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Liang, Jia-Ling
    Ho, Chun-Yen
    2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 901 - 906
  • [23] Pathway towards an ideal and sustainable framework agreement for the public procurement of vaccines in Spain: a multi-criteria decision analysis
    Zozaya Gonzalez, N.
    Alcala Revilla, B.
    Arrazola Martinez, P.
    Chavarri Bravo, J. R.
    Cuesta Esteve, I
    Garcia Rojas, A.
    Martinon-Torres, F.
    Redondo Marguello, E.
    Cuadrado, A. Rivero
    Tamames Gomez, S.
    Villaseca Carmena, J.
    Hidalgo-Vega, A.
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (11) : 2873 - 2884
  • [24] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Identifying Potential Sites for Future Urban Development in Haridwar, India
    Tiwari, Anuj
    Tyagi, Deepak
    Sharma, Surendra Kumar
    Suresh, Merugu
    Jain, Kamal
    ICCCE 2018, 2019, 500 : 761 - 777
  • [25] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Prioritize People for COVID-19 Vaccination When Vaccines Are in Short Supply
    Chaker Masmoudi, Hend
    Rhili, Amal
    Zamali, Imen
    Ben Hmid, Ahlem
    Ben Ahmed, Melika
    Khrouf, Myriam Razgallah
    FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2022, 2
  • [26] A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis based assessment of walling materials in India
    Sabapathy, Ashwin
    Maithel, Sameer
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 64 : 107 - 117
  • [27] A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for prioritization of performance metrics
    Linkov, I.
    Satterstrom, F. K.
    Tkachuk, A.
    Levchenko, A.
    Seager, T. P.
    Figueira, J. R.
    Tervonen, T.
    MANAGING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISKS: DECISION TOOLS AND APPLICATION FOR PORT SECURITY, 2007, : 261 - +
  • [28] Multi-criteria decision analysis - a new approach to an old problem
    Mann, Ronald D.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2007, 16 : S1 - S1
  • [29] Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry
    Stoycheva, Stella
    Marchese, Dayton
    Paul, Cameron
    Padoan, Sara
    Juhmani, Abdul-Salam
    Linkov, Igor
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 187 : 257 - 272
  • [30] A Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Select Contract Manufacturer for Sustainable Development of Automotive Products: an Integrated Framework
    Singh, Prashant Kumar
    Sarkar, Prabir
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 5 (04) : 843 - 857