Development of a Choice-framework for Covid vaccines in India using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach

被引:0
|
作者
George, Tarun K. [1 ]
Nair, Nayana P. [2 ]
Singh, Awnish Kumar
Kumar, A. Dilesh [2 ]
Roy, Arup Deb [3 ,4 ]
Mohan, Varshini Neethi [5 ]
Kang, Gagandeep [2 ]
机构
[1] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Gen Med, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Christian Med Coll & Hosp, Dept GI Sci, Wellcome Trust Labs, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] MoHFW, NTAGI Secretariat, NIHFW, New Delhi, India
[4] John Snow India, New Delhi 110070, India
[5] Indian Inst Technol, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Covid-19; Vaccines; India; Multicriteria decision analysis; MCDA; Decision making; Healthcare;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.062
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccines were crucial in controlling the Covid-19 pandemic. As more vaccines receive reg-ulatory approval, stakeholders will be faced with several options and must make an appropriate choice for themselves. We proposed a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to guide decision -makers in comparing vaccines for the Indian context. Methods: We adhered to the ISPOR guidance for the MCDA process. Seven vaccine options were com-pared under ten criteria. Through three virtual workshops, we obtained opinions and weights from citi-zens, private-sector hospitals, and public health organisations. Available evidence was rescaled and incorporated into the performance matrix. The final score for each vaccine was calculated for the different groups. We performed different sensitivity analyses to assess the consistency of the rank list. Results: The cost, efficacy and operational score of the vaccines had the highest weights among the stake-holders. From the six scenario groups, Janssen had the highest score in four. This was driven by the advantage of having a single dose of vaccination. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the overall group, Covaxin, Janssen, and Sputnik were the first three options. The participants expressed that avail-ability, WHO approvals and safety, among others, would be crucial when considering vaccines. Conclusions: The MCDA process has not been capitalised on in healthcare decision-making in India and LMICs. Considering the available data and stakeholder preference at the time of the study, Covaxin, Janssen, and Sputnik were preferred options. The choice framework with the dynamic performance matrix is a valuable tool that could be adapted to different population groups and extended based on increasing vaccine options and emerging evidence. *ISPOR - The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:3755 / 3762
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [2] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [3] Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccines Using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Son, Kyung-Hwa
    Kwon, Sun-Hong
    Na, Hye-Jung
    Baek, Youngsuk
    Kim, Inok
    Lee, Eui-Kyung
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision analysis to prioritize the introduction of new vaccines in Indonesia by using the framework of the strategic multi-attribute ranking tool for vaccines (SMART vaccines)
    Suwantika, Auliya A.
    Purwadi, Febby V.
    Zakiyah, Neily
    Puspitasari, Irma M.
    Abdulah, Rizky
    Diantini, Ajeng
    Boersma, Cornelis
    Postma, Maarten J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2021, 20 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [5] DEVELOPMENT OF A GLUCOCORTICOID TOXICITY INDEX USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Miloslavsky, E. M.
    Naden, R. L.
    Stone, J. H.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 53 - 54
  • [6] Development of a Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Miloslaysky, Eli
    Naden, Raymond P.
    Bijlsma, Johannes Wj
    Brogan, Paul
    Browns, Sherwood
    Brunetta, Paul
    Buttgereit, Frank
    Choi, Hyon K.
    Dicaire, Jean-Francois
    Gelfand, Jeffrey
    Heaney, Liam
    Lightstone, Liz
    Lu, Leo
    Murrell, Dedee
    Petri, Michelle
    Rosenbaum, James T.
    Saag, Kenneth
    Urowitz, Murray
    Winthrop, Kevin L.
    Stone, John H.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [7] A spatiotemporal analysis of oil spill severity using a multi-criteria decision framework
    Nelson, Jake R.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 199
  • [8] A spatiotemporal analysis of oil spill severity using a multi-criteria decision framework
    Nelson, Jake R.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    Ocean and Coastal Management, 2021, 199
  • [9] Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Ruan, Da
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 77 (5-6) : 464 - 475
  • [10] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION IN THE CHOICE OF ADVERTISING TOOLS
    Prvulovic, Slavica
    Tolmac, Dragisa
    Zivkovic, Zivan
    Radovanovic, Ljiljana
    FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 6 (01) : 91 - 100