Do agricultural productive services alleviate farmland abandonment? Evidence from China rural household panel survey data

被引:9
|
作者
Tian, Yuan [1 ]
Gao, Yanlei [2 ]
Pu, Chenxi [3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
farmland abandonment; agricultural productive services; CRHPS data; China; mediating effects; LAND FRAGMENTATION; CROPLAND ABANDONMENT; MOUNTAINOUS AREAS; MIGRATION; IMPACT; OWNERSHIP; DRIVERS; LABOR; DETERMINANTS; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1072005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important means to solve "who will farm" and "how to farm" in the future, agricultural productive services change the allocation structure of agricultural factors and play an important role in alleviating farmland abandonment. This study uses the 2017 China Rural Household Panel Survey data and adopts the logistic model, the IV Tobit model, and the mediating effect model to investigate the impact of agricultural productive services on farmland abandonment. The results show: (1) Agricultural productive services significantly reduce farmland abandonment by 1.51% on average. (2) Mechanism analysis implies that agricultural labour substitution, land transfer effect, and technological adoption effect play important intermediary roles in alleviating farmland abandonment. (3) Moreover, compared with the eastern, central, and non-karst regions, agricultural productive services failed to reduce farmland abandonment in the western and karst regions with poor terrain conditions. Agricultural productive services could alleviate the farmland abandonment of small farmers and elderly farmers. Therefore, agricultural productive services contribute to the reuse of small-scale plots.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Agricultural Policy, Climate Factors and Grain Output: Evidence From Household Survey Data in Rural China
    CHEN Yong-fu
    WU Zhi-gang
    ZHU Tie-hui
    YANG Lei
    MAGuo-ying
    Chien Hsiao-ping
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12 (01) : 169 - 183
  • [12] Agricultural Policy, Climate Factors and Grain Output: Evidence From Household Survey Data in Rural China
    Chen Yong-fu
    Wu Zhi-gang
    Zhu Tie-hui
    Yang Lei
    Ma Guo-ying
    Chien Hsiao-ping
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2013, 12 (01) : 169 - 183
  • [13] Can Agricultural Machinery Harvesting Services Reduce Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from Rural China
    Xue, Ping
    Han, Xinru
    Wang, Yongchun
    Wang, Xiudong
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [14] Convergence in food consumption in Rural China: Evidence from household survey data
    Wan, GH
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 16 (01) : 90 - 102
  • [15] The impact of high-standard farmland construction on farmland abandonment by farm households: evidence from rural China
    Li, Ruisheng
    Zhou, Wenfeng
    Guo, Shili
    Song, Jiahao
    Xu, Dingde
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025,
  • [16] Rural household food consumption in China: Evidence from the rural household survey.
    Han, T
    Cramar, GL
    Wahl, TI
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1997, 22 (02): : 402 - 403
  • [17] How Does Farmland Tenure Security Affect Rural Household Income? Empirical Evidence of China's Survey Data
    Zhang, Juan
    Chen, Qinping
    Chen, Hongxi
    Feng, Zehua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [18] FOOD DEMAND IN RURAL CHINA - EVIDENCE FROM RURAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
    FAN, SG
    CRAMER, G
    WAILES, E
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 11 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [19] Do the types of agricultural socialized services and their diverse suppliers matter to farmland renting in rural China?
    Cao, Yueming
    Bai, Yunli
    Zhang, Linxiu
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2024, 94
  • [20] Agricultural services and rural household welfare: empirical evidence from Ghana
    Asante, Bright Owusu
    Prah, Stephen
    Addai, Kwabena Nyarko
    Anang, Benjamin
    Ng'ombe, John N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 52 (02) : 157 - 176