Judicial bypass for minors post-Dobbs

被引:2
|
作者
Horvath, Sarah [1 ,3 ]
Frietsche, Susan [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hershey, PA USA
[2] Womens Law Project, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Penn State Univ Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 500 Univ Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
关键词
abortion; adolescent health; judicial bypass; minor; parental involvement laws; reproductive health; PARENTAL CONSENT; ABORTION;
D O I
10.1177/17455057231219601
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
State laws that require minors seeking abortion care to notify or obtain consent from a parent or other legal guardian are broadly referred to as parental involvement laws. Judicial bypass allows a minor to petition the court to bypass parental involvement. Even before the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overturned Roe v Wade on 24 June 2022, 36 states had at least one parental involvement law, making minor access to abortion care even more complex than adult access. Since the Dobbs decision, at least 15 states have completely banned abortion, adding further complexity, geographic barriers, and inequities to the pursuit of reproductive healthcare. In this narrative review and commentary, we explain parental involvement laws and judicial bypass from both a legal and medical perspective, exploring the evolving challenges created by this system in the year post-Dobbs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contraceptive care post-Dobbs: A qualitative study of clinic staff perspectives
    Vandevusse, Alicia
    Mueller, Jennifer
    Mulhern, Octavia
    Cech, Sidney
    SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH, 2025, 7
  • [42] Enacting embryos: Practices, ontologies, and politics of the IVF lab post-Dobbs
    Lefevre, Manon
    MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2025,
  • [43] The perceived impact of a post-Dobbs landscape on US adolescents and young adults
    Allison, Bianca A.
    Vear, Kinsey
    Hoopes, Andrea J.
    Maslowsky, Julie
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 138
  • [44] Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective
    Pyle, Alaina
    Adams, Shannon Y.
    Cortezzo, DonnaMaria E.
    Fry, Jessica T.
    Henner, Natalia
    Laventhal, Naomi
    Lin, Matthew
    Sullivan, Kevin
    Wraight, C. Lydia
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (05) : 628 - 634
  • [45] Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective
    Alaina Pyle
    Shannon Y. Adams
    DonnaMaria E. Cortezzo
    Jessica T. Fry
    Natalia Henner
    Naomi Laventhal
    Matthew Lin
    Kevin Sullivan
    C. Lydia Wraight
    Journal of Perinatology, 2024, 44 : 628 - 634
  • [46] Social Work in a Post-Dobbs World: The 'Adoption Fallacy', Decolonization, and Reproductive Justice
    Cheney, Kristen
    Rotabi, Karen Smith
    AFFILIA-FEMINIST INQUIRY IN SOCIAL WORK, 2024, 39 (02): : 202 - 213
  • [47] Abortion training in US obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in a post-Dobbs era
    Vinekar, Kavita
    Karlapudi, Aishwarya
    Bauer, Callie Cox
    Steinauer, Jody
    Rible, Radhika
    Brown, Katherine
    Turk, Jema K.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 130
  • [48] Post-Dobbs legal conundrums surrounding preimplantation in vitro fertilization embryo dispositions
    Crockin, Susan
    Altman, Amy B.
    Rinehart, Lisa
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [49] CHANGE IN VASECTOMY PRACTICE PATTERNS POST-DOBBS: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
    Patel, Rutul D.
    Loloi, Justin
    Kianian, Reza
    Andino, Juan J.
    Patil, Dattatraya
    Mehta, Akansha
    Dietrich, Peter
    Sandlow, Jay
    MacDonald, Susan M.
    Valadon, Crystal L.
    Nangia, Ajay K.
    Sura, Avi
    Weliver, Robert C.
    Watts, Kara
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E819 - E820
  • [50] Comments on 'The New Threat to Medical Travel for Abortion': Post-Dobbs Abortion Provision
    Quinn, M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 137 (07): : e144 - e145