Seismic fragility curves for buried steel gas pipelines with corrosion damage

被引:1
|
作者
Farhang, Mitra [1 ]
Hassani, Nemat [2 ]
Seyedkazemi, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Earthquake Masters Degree, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Amol, Iran
关键词
Buried steel pipeline; Gas network; Corrosion; Incremental dynamic analysis; Seismic fragility curve; CORRODING PIPELINES; GROUND MOTIONS; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; FINITE; PIPE;
D O I
10.1007/s41062-023-01340-1
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Gas-buried steel pipes are exposed to various types of corrosion during their service life, and as a result, their initial resistance is significantly reduced. In most previous studies, the seismic vulnerability analysis of these pipes has been done without considering corrosion. The present study evaluates the seismic vulnerability of gas-buried steel pipes and extracts fragility curves considering pipe corrosion. Due to the impossibility of objectively observing the corrosion rate of pipes, a probabilistic model is presented considering the random effect in pipeline corrosion, and for different percentages of corrosion, the critical corrosion range is calculated. Then by modeling the corroded pipe in the soil and applying earthquake acceleration to it, incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is performed in ABAQUS software and IDA curves are obtained. In the following, the probability of exceedance curves for strain are extracted, and the probability of vulnerability for different pipe corrosion conditions is determined. Finally, the seismic fragility curves of the pipeline showing the probability of failure (POF) as a function of peak ground acceleration (PGA) are obtained. The results show that corrosion percentage, variety of corrosion points, and PGA, strongly affect the uncertainty of strain data and subsequently the probability of failure of the pipeline system. For PGA = 0.4 g, in the case of a healthy pipe, the probability of exceeding the failure criterion strain is close to zero, while this probability is close to 80% for a pipe with average corrosion of 60%.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic behavior of on-grade steel tanks; Fragility curves
    O'Rourke, MJ
    So, P
    OPTIMIZING POST-EARTHQUAKE LIFELINE SYSTEM RELIABILITY, 1999, (16): : 849 - 858
  • [22] Seismic analysis of buried pipelines
    Owens, FC
    OPTIMIZING POST-EARTHQUAKE LIFELINE SYSTEM RELIABILITY, 1999, (16): : 130 - 139
  • [23] A new approach for estimating seismic damage of buried water supply pipelines
    Sakai, H.
    Pulido, N.
    Hasegawa, K.
    Kuwata, Y.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (09): : 1531 - 1548
  • [24] Framework for Seismic Damage and Renewal Cost Analysis of Buried Water Pipelines
    Mazumder, Ram K.
    Fan, Xudong
    Salman, Abdullahi M.
    Li, Yue
    Yu, Xiong
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2020, 11 (04)
  • [25] AC corrosion of buried pipelines
    不详
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 2013, 52 (05) : 43 - 43
  • [26] AC corrosion of buried pipelines
    不详
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 2007, 46 (02) : 29 - 29
  • [27] Study on AC Stray Current Corrosion Law of Buried Steel Pipelines
    Wang Xinhua
    Yang Guoyong
    Huang Hai
    Chen Zhenhua
    Wang Limei
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS IN INDUSTRY, PTS 1-4, 2013, 263-266 : 448 - +
  • [28] Analytical fragility curves for assessment of the seismic vulnerability of HP/HT unburied subsea pipelines
    Mina, Daniele
    Forcellini, Davide
    Karampour, Hassan
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 137 (137)
  • [29] Seismic fragility analysis of retrofitted steel tanks considering corrosion
    Joorabi, Ali Tavakoli
    Razzaghi, Mehran Seyed
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2019, 172 (10) : 712 - 720
  • [30] Seismic response evaluation of the impact of corrosion on buried pipelines based on the Markov process
    Liu Wei1 and Li Jie1
    Professor
    EarthquakeEngineeringandEngineeringVibration, 2008, (03) : 295 - 303