Environmental life cycle assessment of Finnish broiler chicken production-Focus on climate change and water scarcity impacts

被引:11
|
作者
Usva, Kirsi [1 ]
Hietala, Sanna [2 ]
Nousiainen, Jouni [1 ]
Vorne, Virpi [2 ]
Vieraankivi, Marja-Liisa [1 ]
Jallinoja, Marja [3 ]
Leinonen, Ilkka [3 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Jokioinen, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Oulu, Finland
[3] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Broiler production; Life cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Water scarcity; AWARE; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; UNITED-KINGDOM; GREENHOUSE-GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The production and consumption of poultry meat increases in Finland, but no updated information on the impact of broiler production on climate change has been available, and the impacts of broiler production on water scarcity have never been studied. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology was applied to quantify the climate change and water scarcity impacts of Finnish broiler chicken meat. For water scarcity, the AWARE method was applied for the first time as a characterisation method in broiler chicken production. To harmonize the LCA calculation, the European Commission's Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guidelines were followed when applicable. The comprehensive primary data accounted for 89% of Finnish broiler chicken production in 2018. The climate impact of Finnish broiler chicken meat was found to be 2.37 kg CO2 eq./kg of carcass weight (CW), including the effect of land use change (LUC), and 1.82 kg CO2 eq./kg of CW, excluding LUC. The relative share of the feed chain of the climate change impact of Finnish chicken meat was almost four fifths (79%). The water scarcity impact of Finnish chicken meat was 0.55 m3 eq. (AWARE)/kg CW. More than four fifths (82%) of the water scarcity impact of broiler production are formed in the feed chain. In addition to the national-level results, farm-specific results were calculated for 20 farms to indicate the variation and targets for improvements. In this study, we demonstrated that feeds were even more important in the water scarcity impact category.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life Cycle Water Use of Energy Production and Its Environmental Impacts in China
    Zhang, Chao
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (24) : 14459 - 14467
  • [22] Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Fantke, Peter
    Levasseur, Annie
    McKone, Thomas E.
    Michelsen, Ottar
    Mila i Canals, Llorenc
    Motoshita, Masaharu
    Pfister, Stephan
    Verones, Francesca
    Vigon, Bruce
    Frischknecht, Rolf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (11): : 2189 - 2207
  • [23] Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use
    Olivier Jolliet
    Assumpció Antón
    Anne-Marie Boulay
    Francesco Cherubini
    Peter Fantke
    Annie Levasseur
    Thomas E. McKone
    Ottar Michelsen
    Llorenç Milà i Canals
    Masaharu Motoshita
    Stephan Pfister
    Francesca Verones
    Bruce Vigon
    Rolf Frischknecht
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 2189 - 2207
  • [24] Life cycle cost assessment of railways infrastructure asset under climate change impacts
    Soleimani-Chamkhorami, Khosro
    Garmabaki, A. H. S.
    Kasraei, Ahmad
    Famurewa, Stephen M.
    Odelius, Johan
    Strandberg, Gustav
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 127
  • [25] Determination of the life cycle climate change impacts of land use and albedo change in algal biofuel production
    Fortier, Marie-Odile P.
    Roberts, Griffin W.
    Stagg-Williams, Susan M.
    Sturm, Belinda S. M.
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2017, 28 : 270 - 281
  • [26] Life Cycle Assessment of Thai organic Horn Mali rice to evaluate the climate change, water use and biodiversity impacts
    Mungkung, Rattanawan
    Pengthamkeerati, Patthra
    Chaichana, Ratcha
    Watcharothai, Saranya
    Kitpakornsanti, Kittiwan
    Tapananont, Supachok
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 687 - 694
  • [27] Assessment of future water resources and water scarcity considering the factors of climate change and social–environmental change in Han River basin, Korea
    Soojun Kim
    Byung Sik Kim
    Hwandon Jun
    Hung Soo Kim
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28 : 1999 - 2014
  • [28] Reducing the environmental impacts of vitreous optical fiber production - A Life Cycle Impact Assessment
    Pinto, Julian T. M.
    Amaral, Karen J.
    Hartard, Susanne
    Janissek, Paulo R.
    Helling, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 762 - 776
  • [29] Environmental impacts of extensive beef production in Colombia by life cycle assessment: a case study
    Arcila, Sara
    Correa, Natalia
    Pachón, Sebastián
    Valderrama, Luis Giraldo A.
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (43) : 55720 - 55735
  • [30] Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment
    Presumido, Pedro Henrique
    Sousa, Fernando
    Goncalves, Artur
    Dal Bosco, Tatiane Cristina
    Feliciano, Manuel
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (10):