Volcanic Ash Classification Through Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Benet, Damia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Costa, Fidel [1 ]
Widiwijayanti, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Cite, CNRS, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Paris, France
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, EOS, Earth Observ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Asian Sch Environm, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
volcanic ash classification; machine learning; XGBoost; vision transformer; interpretable AI; SHAP; SAKURAJIMA VOLCANO; ERUPTION; INSIGHTS; EVOLUTION; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1029/2023GC011224
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Volcanic ash provides information that can help understanding the evolution of volcanic activity during the early stages of a crisis and possible transitions toward different eruptive styles. Ash consists of particles from a range of origins within the volcanic system and its analysis can be indicative of the processes driving the eruptive activity. However, classifying ash particles into different types is not straightforward. Diagnostic observations for particle classification are not standardized and vary across samples. Here we explore the use of machine learning (ML) to improve the classification accuracy and reproducibility. We use a curated database of ash particles (VolcAshDB) to optimize and train two ML-based models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) that uses the measured physical attributes of the particles, from which predictions are interpreted by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method, and a Vision Transformer (ViT) that classifies binocular, multi-focused, particle images. We find that the XGBoost has an overall classification accuracy of 0.77 (macro F1-score), and specific features of color (hue_mean) and texture (correlation) are the most discriminant between particle types. Classification using the particle images and the ViT is more accurate (macro F1-score of 0.93), with performances varying from 0.85 for samples of dome explosions, to 0.95 for phreatic and subplinian events. Notwithstanding the success of the classification algorithms, the training dataset is limited in number of particles, ranges of eruptive styles, and volcanoes. Thus, the algorithms should be tested further with additional samples, and it is likely that classification for a given volcano is more accurate than between volcanoes. Volcanic ash particles are classified through machine learning algorithms into juvenile, lithic, free-crystal and altered material types Discriminant features per each particle type are revealed by the Shapley values of XGBoost's predictions Classification by a Vision Transformer model is very accurate and could be used by volcano observatories
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A machine-learning approach for automatic classification of volcanic seismicity at La Soufriere Volcano, Guadeloupe
    Falcin, Alexis
    Metaxian, Jean-Philippe
    Mars, Jerome
    Stutzmann, Eleonore
    Komorowski, Jean-Christophe
    Moretti, Roberto
    Malfante, Marielle
    Beauducel, Francois
    Saurel, Jean-Marie
    Dessert, Celine
    Burtin, Arnaud
    Ucciani, Guillaume
    de Chabalier, Jean-Bernard
    Lemarchand, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2021, 411
  • [22] Geochemical Discrimination of Agate in Diverse Volcanic Host Rocks Through Machine Learning Methods
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Bo-Chao
    Huang, Xiao-Wen
    Xi, Xi
    MINERALS, 2025, 15 (01)
  • [23] Volcanic Ash
    Stockhofe-Zurwieden, Norbert
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE, 2010, 135 (09) : 365 - 365
  • [24] CPT-Based Soil Classification through Machine Learning Techniques
    Athar, Mohammad Faraz
    Khoshnevisan, Sara
    Sadik, Laith
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: GEOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS FROM PORE-SCALE TO CITY-SCALE, 2023, : 277 - 292
  • [25] Multiresolution classification of turbulence features in image data through machine learning
    Pulido, Jesus
    da Silva, Ricardo Dutra
    Livescu, Daniel
    Hamann, Bernd
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2021, 214
  • [26] Classification of adulterant degree in liquid solutions through interferograms with machine learning
    Lara-Rodriguez, L. D.
    Alvarez-Tamayo, R. I.
    Barcelata-Pinzon, A.
    Lopez-Melendez, E.
    Prieto-Cortes, P.
    OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 180
  • [27] Classification of biomass reactions and predictions of reaction energies through machine learning
    Chang, Chaoyi
    Medford, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 153 (04):
  • [28] Revolutionizing cardiovascular disease classification through machine learning and statistical methods
    Behera, Tapan Kumar
    Sathia, Siddhartha
    Panigrahi, Sibarama
    Naik, Pradeep Kumar
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [29] Enhancing Classification and Prediction through the Application of Hybrid Machine Learning Models
    Banda, Misheck
    Ngassam, Ernest Ketcha
    Mnkandla, Ernest
    2024 IST-AFRICA CONFERENCE, 2024,
  • [30] Machine Learning Classification of Human Osseous Tissue through Microwave Sensing
    Kerketta S.R.
    Ghosh D.
    Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, 2023, 132 : 89 - 102