Volcanic Ash Classification Through Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Benet, Damia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Costa, Fidel [1 ]
Widiwijayanti, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Cite, CNRS, Inst Phys Globe Paris, Paris, France
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, EOS, Earth Observ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Asian Sch Environm, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
volcanic ash classification; machine learning; XGBoost; vision transformer; interpretable AI; SHAP; SAKURAJIMA VOLCANO; ERUPTION; INSIGHTS; EVOLUTION; TEXTURE;
D O I
10.1029/2023GC011224
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Volcanic ash provides information that can help understanding the evolution of volcanic activity during the early stages of a crisis and possible transitions toward different eruptive styles. Ash consists of particles from a range of origins within the volcanic system and its analysis can be indicative of the processes driving the eruptive activity. However, classifying ash particles into different types is not straightforward. Diagnostic observations for particle classification are not standardized and vary across samples. Here we explore the use of machine learning (ML) to improve the classification accuracy and reproducibility. We use a curated database of ash particles (VolcAshDB) to optimize and train two ML-based models: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) that uses the measured physical attributes of the particles, from which predictions are interpreted by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method, and a Vision Transformer (ViT) that classifies binocular, multi-focused, particle images. We find that the XGBoost has an overall classification accuracy of 0.77 (macro F1-score), and specific features of color (hue_mean) and texture (correlation) are the most discriminant between particle types. Classification using the particle images and the ViT is more accurate (macro F1-score of 0.93), with performances varying from 0.85 for samples of dome explosions, to 0.95 for phreatic and subplinian events. Notwithstanding the success of the classification algorithms, the training dataset is limited in number of particles, ranges of eruptive styles, and volcanoes. Thus, the algorithms should be tested further with additional samples, and it is likely that classification for a given volcano is more accurate than between volcanoes. Volcanic ash particles are classified through machine learning algorithms into juvenile, lithic, free-crystal and altered material types Discriminant features per each particle type are revealed by the Shapley values of XGBoost's predictions Classification by a Vision Transformer model is very accurate and could be used by volcano observatories
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of coal gangue volcanic ash activity based on machine learning
    Li, Yongxin
    Yan, Changwang
    Zhang, Ju
    Bold, Tungalagtamir
    Wang, Jianjun
    Liu, Lifen
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2024, 443
  • [2] Retrieval of Volcanic Ash Cloud Base Height Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Zhao, Fenghua
    Xia, Jiawei
    Zhu, Lin
    Sun, Hongfu
    Zhao, Dexin
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [3] CLASSIFICATION OF MOUNT ETNA (ITALY) VOLCANIC ACTIVITY BY MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES
    Hajian, Alireza
    Cannavo, Flavio
    Greco, Filippo
    Nunnari, Giuseppe
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 62 (02)
  • [4] Classification of crystallographic materials through machine learning
    Lopez-Solorzano, Arturo
    Rendon-Lara, Erendira
    Martinez-Gallegos, Sonia
    Eleuterio, Roberto Alejo
    MRS ADVANCES, 2024, 9 (05) : 279 - 282
  • [5] Strategies for the Optimal Classification of Volcanic Ash Granulometry
    Ando, B.
    Baglio, S.
    Marletta, V.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC), 2015, : 1030 - 1035
  • [6] Reactivity classification prediction of coal fly ash based on machine learning
    Hu T.
    Wu M.
    Hu W.
    Chen Q.
    Qi C.
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2023, 54 (10): : 3829 - 3839
  • [7] Implementation of machine learning for volcanic earthquake pattern classification using XGBoost algorithm
    Ilham Sidik
    Sudarmaji Saroji
    Sulistyani Sulistyani
    Acta Geophysica, 2024, 72 : 1575 - 1585
  • [8] Application of Machine Learning to Classification of Volcanic Deformation in Routinely Generated InSAR Data
    Anantrasirichai, N.
    Biggs, J.
    Albino, F.
    Hill, P.
    Bull, D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2018, 123 (08) : 6592 - 6606
  • [9] Implementation of machine learning for volcanic earthquake pattern classification using XGBoost algorithm
    Sidik, Ilham
    Saroji, Sudarmaji
    Sulistyani, Sulistyani
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2024, 72 (03) : 1575 - 1585
  • [10] Optimization classification of sunflower recognition through machine learning
    Kaur, Rupinder
    Jain, Anubha
    Kumar, Sarvesh
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 51 : 207 - 211