Advances in diabetes management: have pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes changed in the last decades?

被引:0
|
作者
Citro, Fabrizia [1 ,4 ]
Bianchi, Cristina [2 ]
Nicoll, Francesca [1 ]
Aragona, Michele [2 ]
Marchetti, Piero [1 ]
Di Cianni, Graziano [3 ]
Bertolotto, Alessandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Hosp Pisa, Dept Med, Pisa, Italy
[3] Livorno Hosp, Diabet & Metab Dis Unit, Livorno, Italy
[4] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Via Paradisa 2, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Pregnancy outcomes; Type; 1; diabetes; Therapeutic approaches; Novel technologies; SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION; WEIGHT-GAIN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INJECTIONS; GLARGINE; DETEMIR; ASPART; RISK; CSII;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110979
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Over the recent years multiple therapeutic and management opportunities have been made available to treat pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). However, analyses assessing whether these different approaches may have any specific advantage/disadvantage in metabolic control and neonatal outcomes is still limited. To compare metabolic control and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM among different basal insulins (NPH vs. analogue), insulin administration ways [Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) vs. Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII)] and glucose monitoring systems [Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) vs. real-time/intermittently scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM/isCGM)].Methods: A retrospective analysis on metabolic data and neonatal outcomes of 136 T1DM pregnant women (76% on MDI, based on NPH(51%) or analogue(49%); 24% on CSII; 24% using rtCGM/isCGM), managed between 2008 and 2020, was performed, comparing different therapeutic approaches.Results: Metabolic data and neonatal outcomes were comparable among women treated with different basal insulins. Women on CSII planned their pregnancy more frequently (82vs.60%; p=0.043) and had better pregestational HbA1c (52 +/- 5 vs. 60 +/- 13mmol/mol; p=0.044) and first trimester HbA1c (48 +/- 4 vs. 51 +/- 8 mmol/mol; p=0.047), respectively. Pregestational and first trimester HbA1c were also lower in women using rtCGM/isCGM (53 +/- 8 vs. 58 +/- 13mmol/mol; p=0.027 and 46 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 7mmol/mol; p=0.034, respectively). In the whole cohort, LGA risk was directly correlated to HbA1c at third trimester (correlation coefficient 0.335, p=0.001) and inversely correlated to the achievement of HbA1c target (<= 6% [<42 mmol/mol]) at third trimester (correlation coefficient - 0.367, p <0.001).Conclusion: Treatment with insulin analogs didn't significantly change metabolic control and neonatal outcomes in T1DM women, while CSII and rtCGM/isCGM can optimize preconception and first trimester pregnancy glycemic control. Irrespective of the therapeutic management, third trimester HbA1c remains the strongest risk factor for LGA.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AN AUDIT OF PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN WOMEN WITH CHILDHOOD ONSET TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Stone, Roy Gavin
    Troy, Emma
    Scully, Paul
    Quinn, Anne
    Moloney, Yvonne
    Neylon, Orla
    Slevin, John
    Noctor, Eoin
    Murphy, Anne Marie
    O'Gorman, Clodagh
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2019, 104 : A274 - A275
  • [32] Effect of pregnancy planning on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with Type 1 diabetes
    Wotherspoon, A. C.
    Young, I. S.
    Patterson, C. C.
    McCance, D. R.
    Holmes, V. A.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2017, 34 (09) : 1303 - 1308
  • [33] Pregnancy Planning and Outcomes in Women with-Type 1 Diabetes by Birth Cohort
    Snell-Bergeon, Janet K.
    Hunter, Cortney
    Maahs, David M.
    Kinney, Gregory L.
    Hokanson, John E.
    Rewers, Marian
    DIABETES, 2009, 58 : A469 - A469
  • [34] Have pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes improved over the past 13 years?
    Pye, S.
    Gennatas, S.
    Dawson, V.
    Halliday, M.
    Hodgett, S.
    Scudamore, I.
    Kong, M.-F.
    Gregory, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 : S385 - S385
  • [35] Diabetes in pregnancy: worse medical outcomes in type 1 diabetes but worse psychological outcomes in gestational diabetes
    Egan, A. M.
    Dunne, F. P.
    Lydon, K.
    Conneely, S.
    Sarma, K.
    McGuire, B. E.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 110 (11) : 721 - 727
  • [36] The management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy
    Egan, A. M.
    Murphy, H. R.
    Dunne, F. P.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 108 (12) : 923 - 927
  • [37] Diabetes Management During Breastfeeding in Women with Type 1 Diabetes
    Lene Ringholm
    Elisabeth Buur Stougaard
    Sidse Kjærhus Nørgaard
    Peter Damm
    Elisabeth R. Mathiesen
    Current Diabetes Reports, 2020, 20
  • [38] Updates in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy
    Mazori, Alon Y.
    Levy, Carol J.
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 53 (03) : 321 - 333
  • [39] Diabetes Management During Breastfeeding in Women with Type 1 Diabetes
    Ringholm, Lene
    Stougaard, Elisabeth Buur
    Norgaard, Sidse Kjaerhus
    Damm, Peter
    Mathiesen, Elisabeth R.
    CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2020, 20 (08)
  • [40] Comparing the different phenotypes of diabetes in pregnancy: Are outcomes worse for women with young-onset type 2 diabetes compared to type 1 diabetes?
    Zhen, Xi May
    Ross, Glynis
    Gauld, Amanda
    Nettel-Aguirre, Alberto
    Noonan, Stephanie
    Constantino, Maria
    Sweeting, Arianne
    Harding, Anna-Jane
    Mackie, Adam
    Chatila, Hend
    McGill, Margaret
    Middleton, Timothy
    Wu, Ted
    Twigg, Stephen
    Wong, Jencia
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 217