Measuring digital government service performance: Evidence from China

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Bei [1 ]
Zhong, Ruohan [1 ]
Wei, Chu [1 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Appl Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Digital service; Government; Performance evaluation; SFA; China; PUBLIC-SECTOR; EFFICIENCY EVIDENCE; PANEL-DATA; DECENTRALIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; HETEROGENEITY; DETERMINANTS; INEFFICIENCY; TECHNOLOGY; CORRUPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Digital services of the public sector are regarded as one of the most crucial aspects of the administrative system's reform. However, empirical studies on digital services are insufficient, especially for service performance evaluation. This paper establishes a conceptual framework to model service performance with quantity and quality output measures. Based on the panel data of Chinese cities from 2017 to 2020, we employ a one-step stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to estimate the city's digital government service efficiency (DGSE) and examine its drivers. The findings suggest that the proposed analytical framework is applicable to the public sector performance measurement when quantitative and qualitative outputs are considered. Second, Chinese cities' DGSE levels ranged from 0.149 to 0.999, with a mean of 0.798. The DGSE score also shows significant spatio-temporal heterogeneity, with the eastern area performing best, followed by the middle and western regions, and the northeastern region performing the worst. Further, exogenous factors such as fiscal decentralization, public-private partnership, urban scale, the mayor's ability, and policy intervention substantially affect the DGSE level. The results have significant policy implications for governments' digital transition in the ongoing global digital era.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of government policies on place branding performance: evidence from China
    Zhou, Hui
    Zhang, Yueyi
    Zhou, Li
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 34 (5-6) : 712 - 742
  • [22] Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Weike
    Luo, Qian
    Liu, Shiyuan
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 74 : 105 - 121
  • [23] Firm performance, government regulation, and managerial effort: Evidence from China
    Wu, Dongxu
    Wu, Zhongmin
    STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2021, 30 (06): : 527 - 537
  • [24] Digital Transformation and Manufacturing Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Wang, Hongtao
    Cao, Wencheng
    Wang, Fei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [25] The Impact of Digital Economy on Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Wu, Zhilin
    Long, Haiming
    Shi, Lei
    Song, Hui
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (07) : 1407 - 1431
  • [26] Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Lingduo
    Liu, Shuangshuang
    Zhang, Guofeng
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 88 (04) : 1401 - 1430
  • [27] Enterprise ESG Performance, Digital Transformation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Zheng, Xiuzhi
    Bu, Qianqian
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [28] Technical Foundation, External Environment, and Government Internet Service Capability: Evidence From China
    Jin, Tian
    Dong, Cheng
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [29] Digital transformation of citizens' evaluations of public service delivery: evidence from China
    Wang, Chengwei
    Ma, Liang
    GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 2 (04): : 477 - 497
  • [30] Digital transformation of citizens’ evaluations of public service delivery: evidence from China
    Chengwei Wang
    Liang Ma
    Global Public Policy and Governance, 2022, 2 : 477 - 497