Can implied volatility predict returns on oil market? Evidence from Cross-Quantilogram Approach

被引:11
|
作者
Raggad, Bechir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Majmaah Univ, Coll Business Adm Majmaah, Dept Business Adm, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Carthage, Fac Econ & Management Nabeul, Tunis, Tunisia
[3] Univ Tunis, Higher Inst Management Tunis, BESTMOD Lab, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Quantile dependence; Directional predictability; Granger causalities in quantiles; Cross-quantilogram; Crude oil volatility index; CRUDE-OIL; UNIT-ROOT; TIME-SERIES; PRICE; RISK; DEPENDENCE; ENERGY; OVX;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103277
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper employs the Cross-Quantilogram methodology proposed by Han et al. (2016) to investigate whether the implied volatility of crude oil (OVX) ameliorates the directional predictability of the oil price returns. Our main result documents the existence of a quantile predictability from OVX to WTI returns when the crude oil implied volatility is in the upper conditional quantile. On the other hand, no sufficient evidence in directional predictability is found when the OVX is at the lower to intermediate level. As a part of robustness check, the same analysis was conducted to the Brent returns. The pattern of directional predictability (similar signs) broadly corresponds with those observed on the WTI returns, however, it seems that OVX is more predictive for Brent than WTI. Particularly, the predictive power of OVX is found to be significant during periods of moderate to high OVX and mainly concentrated on lower to intermediate variations in Brent returns. As a result, implied volatility can be considered as a driver with respect to the forthcoming variations of the returns in the spot oil market. Insights gleaned from this study could have important implications for investors and policymakers in terms of portfolio and risk management decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extreme risk spillover of the oil, exchange rate to Chinese stock market: Evidence from implied volatility indexes
    Chen, Lin
    Wen, Fenghua
    Li, Wanyang
    Yin, Hua
    Zhao, Lili
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 107
  • [42] Economic policy uncertainty, oil price volatility and stock market returns: Evidence from a nonlinear model
    Liu, Xiaojun
    Wang, Yunyuan
    Du, Wanying
    Ma, Yong
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2022, 62
  • [43] Impact of crude oil price uncertainty on indian stock market returns: Evidence from oil price volatility index
    Sreenu, Nenavath
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2022, 44
  • [44] The asymmetric and time-varying effects of trade policy uncertainty on the insurance premiums in China: Evidence from cross-quantilogram
    Xiang, Feiyun
    Fu, Yimang
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 67
  • [45] Predictability in implied volatility surfaces: evidence from the Euro OTC FX market
    Chalamandaris, Georgios
    Tsekrekos, Andrianos E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 20 (01): : 33 - 58
  • [46] Idiosyncratic volatility, turnover and the cross-section of stock returns: evidence from the Korean stock market
    Kim, Jungmu
    Lee, Changjun
    Lee, Woo-Hyuk
    Ok, Youngkyung
    Thuy Thi Thu Truong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (12) : 6192 - 6213
  • [47] Stock returns and volatility: Evidence from the Athens Stock market index
    Apergis N.
    Eleptheriou S.
    Journal of Economics and Finance, 2001, 25 (1) : 50 - 61
  • [48] Asymmetric volatility structure of equity returns: Evidence from an emerging market
    Umar, Muhammad
    Mirza, Nawazish
    Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas
    Furqan, Mehreen
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 87 : 330 - 336
  • [49] The information content of implied volatility and jumps in forecasting volatility: Evidence from the Shanghai gold futures market
    Luo, Xingguo
    Qin, Shihua
    Ye, Zinan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 19 : 105 - 111
  • [50] The behavior of the implied volatility surface: Evidence from crude oil futures options
    Bouden, Amine
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND VALUE: VALUATION AND ASSET PRICING, 2008, 3 : 151 - 175