Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Clinical Study

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, Poonam [1 ]
Gupta, Nidhi [2 ]
Kumar, Rajesh [3 ,5 ]
Jaiswal, Apoorva [4 ]
Jaggi, Sahil [3 ]
Sharma, Raydhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Sharda Univ, Sch Med Sci & Res, Dept Anaesthesiol, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Govt Doon Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Dehra Dun, Uttaranchal, India
[3] Era Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[4] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[5] Era Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Haemodynamic stability; Limb surgeries; Local anaesthesia; Postoperative analgesia; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; PERIPHERAL-NERVE;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2024/69087.19112
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Peripheral nerve blocks have recently proven to be extremely promising in terms of patient satisfaction. In upper limb procedures, rapid and deep anaesthesia can be achieved with supraclavicular ultrasound-guided access to the brachial plexus. To improve the quality of local anaesthesia, adjuvants such as magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine have been added to the local anaesthetic. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade (BPB). Materials and Methods: A prospective randomised double-blind study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology from June 2016 to November 2017 ( 1 year and 6 months) at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. A total of 60 patients were divided into two groups using a computer -generated random number for upper limb surgeries (below the mid-humerus) under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group A (n=30) received ropivacaine 0.5% (30 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 50 pg for the supraclavicular block, and Group B received ropivacaine 0.5% (30 mL) plus magnesium sulfate 150 mg in 1 mL Normal Saline (NS) 0.9% for the same block. A comparison of these two groups was conducted for the time of onset, duration of sensory and motor block, haemodynamic stability, postoperative analgesia, and complications. Statistical analyses such as Student's t -test, Chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used. Results: The mean age of Group A was 28.03 +/- 5.86 years and Group B was 31.07 +/- 7.06 years. The sensory block and motor block onset were significantly faster among patients of Group A (6.47 +/- 1.43 min and 8.50 +/- 1.46 min) compared to Group B (9.57 +/- 1.22 min and 11.77 +/- 1.19 min). The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer (p<0.001) in Group A (1034.10 +/- 61.07 min) compared to Group B (460.00 +/- 35.82 min). The duration of sensory block and motor block was also significantly higher (p<0.001) in Group A compared to Group B. Both groups were haemodynamically stable, but sedation was significantly higher in Group A. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 50 pg is a superior adjuvant compared to magnesium sulfate 150 mg with ropivacaine 0.5% in supraclavicular brachial plexus block as it significantly hastens onset time and prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blocks and the duration of analgesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine together as adjuvants of ropivacaine 0.15% for a brachial plexus block lasting 20 hours
    Marrone, Francesco
    Pullano, Carmine
    Paventi, Saverio
    Tomei, Marco
    Bosco, Mario
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (11) : 1052 - 1054
  • [22] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE AND DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK
    Palai, Pramod Kumar
    Soren, Dulal Kishun
    Panda, Prativa
    Dash, Sraban Kumar
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (14): : 1806 - 1810
  • [23] Effect of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine as Additives to 0.5% Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgeries: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Umamaheshwar, M.
    Shwetha, K. M.
    Bhogadi, Ramarao
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (09) : UC44 - UC47
  • [24] Effect of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine Sedation on the Onset and Duration of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Comparative Study
    Kumar, Gunjan
    Dubey, Prakash K.
    Sanjeev, Om P.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2018, 46 (03) : 201 - 207
  • [25] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries
    Jain, Kavita
    Sethi, Surendra Kumar
    Gupta, Vikas
    Garg, Deepak Kumar
    INDIAN ANAESTHETISTS FORUM, 2020, 21 (02): : 121 - 128
  • [26] Determine the Effectiveness of Nulbuphine with Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Imran-Ul-Hassan, Syed
    Qureshi, Salman Athar
    Qurban, Faiqa
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (02): : 1572 - 1574
  • [27] Dexmedetomidine vs dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.5% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Singh, Nidhi
    Gupta, Shikha
    Kathuria, Suneet
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (02) : 238 - 243
  • [28] Addition of clonidine or lignocaine to ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a comparative study
    Bhatia, Rohan
    Payal, Yashwant Singh
    Khurana, Gurjeet
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (04) : 229 - 232
  • [29] Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block- A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Shastri, Yuvaraj
    Nagaraju, Nanjappa
    Priyanka, Ms
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (09) : UC34 - UC37
  • [30] Comparison of hemodynamic changes of magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine for an axillary brachial plexus block
    Shahtaheri, Yousef
    Kamali, Alireza
    Rad, Mohammad Tavakoli
    Yazdi, Bijan
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2019, 8 (07) : 2223 - 2228