Value of NEXUS chest rules in assessment of traumatic chest injuries; a systematic review and a meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Abbasi, Mohammad [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ,3 ,6 ]
Safari, Saeed [4 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Pediat Chron Kidney Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Res Ctr Trauma Police Operat, Directorate Hlth Rescue & Treatment, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Mens Hlth & Reprod Hlth Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, POB 14665-354, Tehran, Iran
[7] Shohadaye Tajrish Hosp, Emergency Dept, Tajrish Sq, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Available online xxxx; Thoracic injuries; Decision rules; Imaging; DECISION INSTRUMENT; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Although many studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Studies (NEXUS) chest rules in assessment of traumatic chest injuries, there still is no consensus on this subject matter. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the current existing lit-erature in order to evaluate the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest rules for assessment of traumatic chest injuries.Method: Databases of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until August 20th, 2022. Two independent reviewers screened the articles related to the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest radiography, NEXUS chest CT-all and NEXUS chest-Major.Results: Data of 6 studies, on 23,741 patients, were included in this review. Since only one article assessed the value of NEXUS chest CT scan, the meta-analysis was performed only on NEXUS chest radiography rule. Pooled analysis on the results of 5 articles showed that the AUC of NEXUS chest radiography rule in assessment of trau-matic chest injuries was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 0.99) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.52), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratio of NEXUS chest radiography rule were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.90) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.06). Overall diagnostic odds ratio was calculated to be 36.67 (95% CI: 19.17 to 70.16).Conclusion: Our findings indicate that NEXUS chest radiography rule is a sensitive decision rule for assessment of traumatic chest injuries, but its specificity was found to be low. However, few articles have investigated the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest rules, especially the NEXUS chest CT scan, and more studies need to be done in order to strengthen the currently provided results.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patnana, Arun Kumar
    Chugh, Ankita
    Chugh, Vinay Kumar
    Kumar, Pravin
    Vanga, Narasimha Rao V.
    Singh, Surjit
    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 37 (03) : 383 - 399
  • [22] Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries in Iran; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Maleki, Mohsen Saheban
    Khedri, Behzad
    Roodposhti, Maryam Ebrahimpour
    Majdabadi, Hesamedin Askari
    Seyedrezaei, Seyedeh Omolbanin
    Amanat, Nasir
    Poursadeqiyan, Mohsen
    Khajehnasiri, Farahnaz
    Amiri, Roya
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [23] Chest CT features in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Taghavi, Mohammadreza
    Shokri, Azar
    Niloofar, Parastoo
    Poorbarat, Salar
    Mollazadeh, Samaneh
    Milani, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2021, 10 (05) : 179 - 189
  • [24] Systematic review with meta-analysis: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for noncardiac chest pain
    Atluri, D. K.
    Chandar, A. K.
    Fass, R.
    Falck-Ytter, Y.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 41 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [25] Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gates, Simon
    Quinn, Tom
    Deakin, Charles D.
    Blair, Laura
    Couper, Keith
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 94 : 91 - 97
  • [26] Chest imaging features of Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Low, Soon K.
    Luu, Mai N.
    Minh, Le H.
    Abdelaal, Abdelaziz
    Ng, Sze Jia
    Gad, Abdelrahman G.
    Nhi, Le H.
    Le, Tran N.
    Huy, Nguyen T.
    MINERVA RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 61 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [27] Diagnostic indicators of non-cardiovascular chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Maria M Wertli
    Katrin B Ruchti
    Johann Steurer
    Ulrike Held
    BMC Medicine, 11
  • [28] Systematic review and meta-analysis of chest radiograph (CXR) findings in COVID-19
    Sadiq, Zuhair
    Rana, Shehroz
    Mahfoud, Ziyad
    Raoof, Ameed
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 : 229 - 238
  • [29] PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR ATYPICAL CHEST PAIN: UPDATE OF A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kisely, S.
    Campbell, L. A.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 50 : 143 - 144
  • [30] Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Hui
    Wang, Dongping
    Yu, Yi
    Zhao, Xiang
    Jing, Xiaoli
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 24