Value of NEXUS chest rules in assessment of traumatic chest injuries; a systematic review and a meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Abbasi, Mohammad [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ,3 ,6 ]
Safari, Saeed [4 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Pediat Chron Kidney Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] Res Ctr Trauma Police Operat, Directorate Hlth Rescue & Treatment, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Mens Hlth & Reprod Hlth Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, POB 14665-354, Tehran, Iran
[7] Shohadaye Tajrish Hosp, Emergency Dept, Tajrish Sq, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Available online xxxx; Thoracic injuries; Decision rules; Imaging; DECISION INSTRUMENT; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2022.12.038
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Although many studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of the National Emergency X-ray Utilization Studies (NEXUS) chest rules in assessment of traumatic chest injuries, there still is no consensus on this subject matter. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the current existing lit-erature in order to evaluate the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest rules for assessment of traumatic chest injuries.Method: Databases of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until August 20th, 2022. Two independent reviewers screened the articles related to the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest radiography, NEXUS chest CT-all and NEXUS chest-Major.Results: Data of 6 studies, on 23,741 patients, were included in this review. Since only one article assessed the value of NEXUS chest CT scan, the meta-analysis was performed only on NEXUS chest radiography rule. Pooled analysis on the results of 5 articles showed that the AUC of NEXUS chest radiography rule in assessment of trau-matic chest injuries was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 to 0.99), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98 to 0.99) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.52), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratio of NEXUS chest radiography rule were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.90) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.06). Overall diagnostic odds ratio was calculated to be 36.67 (95% CI: 19.17 to 70.16).Conclusion: Our findings indicate that NEXUS chest radiography rule is a sensitive decision rule for assessment of traumatic chest injuries, but its specificity was found to be low. However, few articles have investigated the diagnostic value of NEXUS chest rules, especially the NEXUS chest CT scan, and more studies need to be done in order to strengthen the currently provided results.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chest ultrasonography for the emergency diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax and haemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Staub, Leonardo Jonck
    Mazzali Biscaro, Roberta Rodolfo
    Kaszubowski, Erikson
    Maurici, Rosemeri
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (03): : 457 - 466
  • [2] Traumatic kidney injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petrone, Patrizio
    Perez-Calvo, Javier
    Brathwaite, Collin E. M.
    Islam, Shahidul
    Joseph, D'Andrea K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 74 : 13 - 21
  • [3] Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis
    D. Chiumello
    S. Coppola
    S. Froio
    C. Gregoretti
    D. Consonni
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2013, 39 : 1171 - 1180
  • [4] Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chiumello, D.
    Coppola, S.
    Froio, S.
    Gregoretti, C.
    Consonni, D.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 (07) : 1171 - 1180
  • [5] Causes of chest pain in primary care - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haasenritter, Joerg
    Biroga, Tobias
    Keunecke, Christian
    Becker, Annette
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    Stadje, Rebekka
    Viniol, Annika
    Boesner, Stefan
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (05) : 422 - 430
  • [6] Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Guanhua
    Zhang, Yu
    Ma, Hongmin
    Zheng, Junmeng
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 6099 - 6112
  • [7] Value of chest computed tomography scan in diagnosis of COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hasti Hossein
    Kosar Mohamed Ali
    Mostafa Hosseini
    Arash Sarveazad
    Saeed Safari
    Mahmoud Yousefifard
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2020, 8 : 469 - 481
  • [8] Value of chest computed tomography scan in diagnosis of COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hossein, Hasti
    Ali, Kosar Mohamed
    Hosseini, Mostafa
    Sarveazad, Arash
    Safari, Saeed
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2020, 8 (06) : 469 - 481
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of tube thoracostomy following traumatic chest injury; suction versus water seal
    Tim Michael Feenstra
    Chris Dickhoff
    Jaap Deunk
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2018, 44 : 819 - 827
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis of tube thoracostomy following traumatic chest injury; suction versus water seal
    Feenstra, Tim Michael
    Dickhoff, Chris
    Deunk, Jaap
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 44 (06) : 819 - 827