Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: Is It a Safe and Effective Option in Preschool Children?

被引:1
|
作者
Gatti, Claudia [1 ]
Cerchia, Elisa [2 ]
Della Corte, Marcello [2 ,5 ]
Catti, Massimo [2 ]
Caravaggi, Francesca [1 ]
Campobasso, Davide [3 ]
Granelli, Pietro [3 ]
Nappo, Simona Gerocarni [2 ]
Ferretti, Stefania [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Univ Parma, Pediat Surg & Urol, Parma, Italy
[2] Citta Salute & Sci Torino, Pediat Urol Unit, Turin, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Univ Parma, Urol Unit, Parma, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Modena, Urol Unit, Modena, Italy
[5] Univ Turin, Pediat Urol Unit, Citta Salute & Sci Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, I-10126 Turin, Italy
关键词
Renal stones; Pediatric urology; Ureterorenoscopy; Laser lithotripsy; Pre-stent; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.056
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Few studies in the literature describe the Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) outcome in preschool children. We evaluated the feasibility, stone -free rate and complications of RIRS in preschool children at two European tertiary care centres of Pediatric Urology. Material and methods: The retrospective study includes all children undergone RIRS for stones <25 mm from 2017 to 2022. Patients were divided into Group 1 <5 years (G1) and Group 2 >5 years (G2). Semirigid ureterorenoscope 4.5-6.5 Ch and a 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope with a 9.5/11 Ch ureteral access sheath (UAS) were used. Stone -free rate (SFR) was evaluated at 3 months. Fischer/Chi-square test for qualitative data and Mann -Whitney for quantitative data were used for statistical analysis. Results: 63 patients underwent RIRS, 19 G1 -patients, median age 3.55 +/- 1.06 years (range 1.5-5 years), and 44 G2 -patients, median age 11.25 +/- 2.95 (range 6-17 years) (p < 0.00001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 1 case in G1(5%) and 3 in G2(7%) (p = 1): two minor ureteric injuries in G2 were treated by a prolonged JJ-stent. Postoperative fever was reported in 3 cases in G1 (16%) and 4 in G2(9%) (p = 0.42), while post -operative hematuria in 4 G1 -patients (21%) and in 7 G2 -patients (16%) (p = 0.72). SFR was 84.2% in G1 and 88.6% in G2. At an average follow-up of 15.05 +/- 4.83 months in G1 and 19.95 +/- 10.36 months in G2, reintervention for residual stones was necessary in 3 cases in G1(16%) and in 6 cases in G2(14%) (p = 1). Conclusions: In a European country with low -volume pediatric stone centers, RIRS is a promising therapeutic option in young children as it offers acceptable stone -free rate and a low incidence of high-grade complications. Level of Evidence: III. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 411
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children
    Ergin, Giray
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kopru, Burak
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Kibar, Yusuf
    Biri, Hasan
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 187 (04) : 1121 - 1126
  • [22] Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10–20-mm renal stones in children
    Giray Ergin
    Mustafa Kirac
    Burak Kopru
    Turgay Ebiloglu
    Yusuf Kibar
    Hasan Biri
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2018, 187 : 1121 - 1126
  • [23] COMPARISON OF MINIATURIZED PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY: WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR 10-20 MM RENAL STONES IN CHILDREN?
    Ozcift, Burak
    Tiryaki, Huseyin Tugrul
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (07): : 643 - 650
  • [24] Retrograde intrarenal Surgery for Kidney Stones in Adulthood
    Lorenz, Judith
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2023, 54 (05) : 348 - 348
  • [25] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults
    Soderberga, Leah
    Erguna, Onuralp
    Ding, Maylynn
    Parker, Robin
    Borofsky, Michael S.
    Pais, Vernon
    Dahm, Philipp
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):
  • [26] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a Cochrane Review
    Soderberg, Leah
    Ergun, Onuralp
    Ding, Maylynn
    Parker, Robin
    Borofsky, Michael
    Pais, Vernon
    Dahm, Philipp
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [27] VILLA TIBERIA EXPERIENCE IN THE TREATMENT OF RENAL STONES WITH RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS)
    Giulianelli, Roberto
    Brunori, Stefano
    Albanesi, Luca
    Attisani, Francesco
    Gentile, Barbara Cristina
    Mavila, Luca
    Mirabile, Gabriella
    Pisanti, Francesco
    Shistani, Teuta
    Schettini, Manlio
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A120 - A120
  • [28] Perirenal Extravasation After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: A Prospective Study
    Shrestha, Anil
    Gharti, Binod B.
    Adhikari, Baikuntha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [29] Feasibility of single-session endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for ipsilateral large renal stones and retrograde intrarenal surgery for contralateral renal stones: Initial experience
    Kwon, Ohseong
    Park, Juhyun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Son, Hwancheol
    Jeong, Hyeon
    Cho, Sung Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 377 - 382
  • [30] Villa Tiberia Experience in the Treatment of Renal Stones with Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)
    Giulianelli, R.
    Gentile, B.
    Pisanti, F.
    Mavilla, L.
    Attisani, F.
    Albanesi, L.
    Mirabile, G.
    Shestani, T.
    Schettini, M.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S320 - S320