Transmission of Viruses from Restroom Use: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Abney, Sarah E. [1 ]
Higham, Ciara A. [2 ]
Wilson, Amanda M. [3 ]
Ijaz, M. Khalid [4 ]
Mckinney, Julie [4 ]
Reynolds, Kelly A. [1 ,3 ]
Gerba, Charles P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Environm Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Leeds, EPSRC Ctr Doctoral Training Fluid Dynam, Leeds, England
[3] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Community Environm & Policy, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Global Res & Dev Lysol & Dettol, Montvale, NJ USA
关键词
QMRA; Virus; Fomites; Hygiene; Public health; ENVIRONMENTAL SURFACES; NOROVIRUS INFECTION; TRANSFER EFFICIENCY; HAND SANITIZER; HEALTH-CARE; CONTAMINATION; SARS-COV-2; AEROSOL; ADENOVIRUS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1007/s12560-023-09580-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Restroom use has been implicated in a number of viral outbreaks. In this study, we apply quantitative microbial risk assessment to quantify the risk of viral transmission by contaminated restroom fomites. We estimate risk from high-touch fomite surfaces (entrance/exit door, toilet seat) for three viruses of interest (SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, norovirus) through eight exposure scenarios involving differing user behaviors, and the use of hand sanitizer following each scenario. We assessed the impacts of several sequences of fomite contacts in the restroom, reflecting the variability of human behavior, on infection risks for these viruses. Touching of the toilet seat was assumed to model adjustment of the seat (open vs. closed), a common touch point in single-user restrooms (home, small business, hospital). A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted for each exposure scenario (10,000 simulations each). Norovirus resulted in the highest probability of infection for all exposure scenarios with fomite surfaces. Post-restroom automatic-dispensing hand sanitizer use reduced the probability of infection for each virus by up to 99.75%. Handwashing within the restroom, an important risk-reduction intervention, was not found to be as effective as use of a non-touch hand sanitizer dispenser for reducing risk to near or below 1/1,000,000, a commonly used risk threshold for comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 78
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of bioaerosols from a manure application site
    Michael A. Jahne
    Shane W. Rogers
    Thomas M. Holsen
    Stefan J. Grimberg
    Aerobiologia, 2015, 31 : 73 - 87
  • [12] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of bioaerosols from a manure application site
    Jahne, Michael A.
    Rogers, Shane W.
    Holsen, Thomas M.
    Grimberg, Stefan J.
    AEROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 31 (01) : 73 - 87
  • [13] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [14] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [15] Quantitative microbial risk assessment - An Australian perspective
    Vanderlinde, P
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 1998, 50 (12): : 626 - 628
  • [16] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Stratev, Deyan
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [17] 'Omics' technologies in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Brul, S.
    Bassett, J.
    Cook, P.
    Kathariou, S.
    McClure, P.
    Jasti, P. R.
    Betts, R.
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 12 - 24
  • [18] Sensitivity analysis in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Zwietering, MH
    van Gerwen, SJC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 58 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [19] Quantitative microbial risk assessment associated with the use of container-based toilets in Haiti
    Jean-Baptiste, Davidson
    De Giudici, Pascal
    Monette, Frederic
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 88 (05) : 1332 - 1343
  • [20] Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water re-use via aquifers
    Page, Declan
    Toze, Simon
    MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 2009, 30 (01) : 20 - 21