A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Minghu [1 ]
Hu, Zhiwei [2 ]
Miao, Lihui [1 ]
Shi, Manman [1 ]
Gao, Qiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Rehabil Hosp, Emergency Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Acupuncture Moxibust & Tuina, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Rehabil Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Room 313,Bldg 9,15 Xixiazhuang South Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
emergency department (ED); emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS-ADP); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); systematic review; SENSITIVITY TROPONIN-I; VALIDATION; DISCHARGE; ACCURACY; PATHWAYS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1002/clc.24126
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS-ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS-ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS-ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53-0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08-2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02-0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45-106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79-0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS-ADP identified a considerable number of low-risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30-days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RISK STRATIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN
    MARK, DB
    PRIMARY CARE, 1994, 21 (03): : 495 - 516
  • [42] Chest pain in the emergency department: frequency, clinical profile, and risk stratification with CPU-65 score
    Martinez-Selles, M.
    Bueno, H.
    Sacristan, A.
    Estevez, A.
    Ortiz, J.
    Gallego, L.
    Fernandez-Aviles, F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 : 444 - 444
  • [43] Risk stratification in patients with chest pain
    Mark, DB
    PRIMARY CARE, 2001, 28 (01): : 99 - +
  • [44] Validation of the TIMI risk score in Chinese patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain
    Graham, Colin A.
    Tsay, Selena X. H.
    Rotheray, Kathleen R.
    Rainer, Timothy H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (01) : 597 - 598
  • [45] Validation of the TIMI Risk Score in Chinese Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain
    Graham, C. A.
    Rotheray, K. R.
    Tsay, S. X.
    Rainer, T. H.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : S209 - S210
  • [46] Safely Identifying Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain for Early Discharge: HEART Pathway Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol
    Mahler, Simon A.
    Lenoir, Kristin M.
    Wells, Brian J.
    Burke, Gregory L.
    Duncan, Pamela W.
    Case, L. Douglas
    Herrington, David M.
    Diaz-Garelli, Jose-Franck
    Futrell, Wendell M.
    Hiestand, Brian C.
    Miller, Chadwick D.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (22) : 2456 - 2468
  • [47] Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department RESPONSE
    Poldervaart, Judith M.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Six, Jacob
    Veldkamp, Rolf F.
    Hoes, Arno W.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (09) : 688 - 688
  • [48] A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department
    Backus, B. E.
    Six, A. J.
    Kelder, J. C.
    Bosschaert, M. A. R.
    Mast, E. G.
    Mosterd, A.
    Veldkamp, R. F.
    Wardeh, A. J.
    Tio, R.
    Braam, R.
    Monnink, S. H. J.
    van Tooren, R.
    Mast, T. P.
    van den Akker, F.
    Cramer, M. J. M.
    Poldervaart, J. M.
    Hoes, A. W.
    Doevendans, P. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (03) : 2153 - 2158
  • [49] Pediatric Chest Pain: A Review of Diagnostic Tools in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Huang, Szu-Wei
    Liu, Ying-Kuo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (05)
  • [50] Comparing Emergency Department Risk Stratification Tools for Chest Pain in African Americans
    Fadiran, Olusayo
    Mallipeddi, Vishnu Priya
    Mbey, Emmanuel
    Janna, Henry
    Atanda, Adebayo
    Mahbubur, Sumon
    Ngwa, Julius
    Larbi, Daniel A.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140