Impact of Former Peat Extraction Field Afforestation on Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Hemiboreal Region

被引:5
|
作者
Samariks, Valters [1 ]
Lazdins, Andis [1 ]
Bardule, Arta [1 ]
Kaleja, Santa [1 ]
Butlers, Aldis [1 ]
Spalva, Gints [1 ]
Jansons, Aris [1 ]
机构
[1] Latvian State Forest Res Inst Silava, Rigas Str 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
来源
FORESTS | 2023年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
CO2; CH4; re-cultivation; CARBON-DIOXIDE; METHANE; FLUXES; SPRUCE; PINE; FORESTS; STANDS; POOLS; N2O; CH4;
D O I
10.3390/f14020184
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change mitigation are global issues. Peatlands in Europe are widely distributed in the Nordic-Baltic region, and Baltic countries are some of the largest peat suppliers for horticulture in Europe. However, there is no sustainable substitute for peat in the horticulture industry. Therefore, it is necessary to identify suitable re-cultivation types for former peat extraction fields, because knowledge about the effect of re-cultivation on annual carbon and GHG budgets is limited. Ecosystem GHG (CO2, CH4, N2O) exchange measurements, environmental parameter assessment and sampling in the study were conducted in a hemiboreal vegetation zone for 24 consecutive months in former peat extraction fields with different re-cultivation management strategies (land use types). The aim of the study was to assess the influence of diverse re-cultivation management strategies on the GHG emissions of former peat extraction fields. The most suitable re-cultivation management is afforestation with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in order to obtain the lowest annual CO(2)eq values and ensure additional carbon sequestration in living tree biomass. The developed linear mixed-effect models showed a good model fit ((RCO2)-C-2 = 0.80, (RCH4)-C-2 = 0.74) for the analyzed land use types, and thus can be used for CO2 and CH4 emissions estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water management effect on soil oxidation, greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrogen leaching in drained peat soils
    Rodriguez, Andres F.
    Daroub, Samira H.
    Gerber, Stefan
    Jennewein, Stephen P.
    Singh, Maninder P.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2021, 85 (03) : 814 - 828
  • [22] Soil greenhouse gas emissions from drained and rewetted agricultural bare peat mesocosms are linked to geochemistry
    Nielsen, C. K.
    Elsgaard, L.
    Jorgensen, U.
    Laerke, P. E.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 896
  • [23] Impact of congestion on greenhouse gas emissions for road transport in Mumbai metropolitan region
    Bharadwaj, Shashank
    Ballare, Sudheer
    Rohit
    Chandel, Munish K.
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25 : 3542 - 3555
  • [24] Impact Assessment of the Upper Silesian Industrial Region on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Poland
    Barbara Białecka
    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2003, 148 : 335 - 346
  • [25] Impact assessment of the Upper Silesian Industrial Region on greenhouse gas emissions in Poland
    Bialecka, B
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2003, 148 (1-4): : 335 - 346
  • [26] Impact of drainage on peatland soil environments and greenhouse gas emissions in Northeast China
    Yang, Tao
    Jiang, Jing
    He, Qiang
    Shi, Fengxue
    Jiang, Haibo
    Wu, Haitao
    He, Chunguang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [27] Greenhouse gas emissions from digestate in soil
    Dietrich, Maria
    Fongen, Monica
    Foereid, Bente
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RECYCLING OF ORGANIC WASTE IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 9 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [28] Soil's greenhouse gas emissions investigated
    不详
    TCE, 2009, (821): : 9 - 9
  • [29] Greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian peat extraction, 1990-2000: A life-cycle analysis
    Cleary, J
    Roulet, NT
    Moore, TR
    AMBIO, 2005, 34 (06) : 456 - 461
  • [30] Greenhouse gas emissions in restored secondary tropical peat swamp forests
    Murdiyarso, Daniel
    Saragi-Sasmito, Meli Fitriani
    Rustini, Anggi
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2019, 24 (04) : 507 - 520