Conservation decision makers worry about relevancy and funding but not climate change

被引:2
|
作者
Jewell, Kathryn [1 ,6 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [1 ]
Martin, Mallory [2 ]
Stevenson, Kathryn T. [3 ]
Terando, Adam [4 ,5 ]
Teseneer, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ, Dept Forestry & Envrionmental Resources, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] US Fish & Wildlife Serv Sci Applicat, 1751 Vars Dr, Raleigh, NC 27699 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Pk Recreat & Tourism Management, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, US Geol Survey, Southeast Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, Campus Box 7617, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[5] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Appl Ecol, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[6] North Carolina State Univ, 2820 Faucette Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2023年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
climate change; conservation leadership; management; planning; wildlife agencies; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; HUNTER RECRUITMENT; BIODIVERSITY; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; BENEFICIARIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1424
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Stakeholders fundamentally shape the success of wildlife management, yet little is known about how one of the most important stakeholder groups, wildlife agency decision makers, view emerging conservation challenges. Wildlife agency decision makers collectively shape how wildlife conservation unfolds in North America, but their perspectives are generally absent in the literature. Challenges including climate change, conservation funding models, and wildlife disease make understanding how wildlife decision makers view the future of wildlife conservation essential. We interviewed 48 directors and supervisory board members of wildlife agencies in the southeast United States from July 2019 to January 2020 to gauge their assessment of future conservation challenges and preferred response strategies. Declining agency relevancy and insufficient funding were the 2 most commonly identified challenges, while climate change was rarely mentioned as an issue because decision makers believed it was a relatively slow-moving background condition. Decision makers described improving relevance through education and outreach as their primary response to conservation challenges. Our results suggest that climate change-informed wildlife management may benefit from a 2-pronged approach. First, we suggest decision makers should be informed about the challenges posed by climate change, and second, existing efforts to promote diversity among constituents should include engaging groups who support tackling the threat climate change poses to wildlife conservation. Increasing the priority given to climate change adaptation efforts in wildlife agencies will likely require future research to discern which approaches can most improve the perceived salience of climate change to decision makers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Government funding for climate change research
    不详
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 2010, 62 (04): : 154 - 155
  • [42] What transitions for climate change mitigation? Global transformations, societal dimensions and insights for decision makers
    Waisman, Henri
    COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE, 2020, 352 (4-5) : 319 - 328
  • [43] Do forest decision-makers in Southeastern Norway adapt forest management to climate change?
    Heltorp, Kaja Mathilde Aamodt
    Kangas, Annika
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2018, 33 (03) : 278 - 290
  • [44] Modelling of adaptation to climate change and decision-makers behaviours for the Veluwe forest area in the Netherlands
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    Didion, Markus
    Jacobsen, Jette B.
    Meilby, Henrik
    Hengeveld, Geerten M.
    Schelhaas, Mart-Jan
    Thorsen, Bo J.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 54 : 1 - 10
  • [45] Perspectives of Decision Makers and Regulators on Climate Change and Adaptation in Expedition Cruise Ship Tourism in Nunavut
    Johnston, Adrianne
    Johnston, Margaret
    Stewart, Emma
    Dawson, Jackie
    Lemelin, Harvey
    NORTHERN REVIEW, 2012, (35): : 69 - 95
  • [46] Dangerous news: Media decision making about climate change risk
    Smith, J
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (06) : 1471 - 1482
  • [47] The threat of funding cuts for graduate medical education: Survey of decision makers
    Kozak, RJ
    Kazzi, AA
    Langdorf, MI
    Martinez, CTJ
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (07) : 736 - 741
  • [48] Want Changes in Content? Change the Decision Makers
    Hardin, Marie
    COMMUNICATION & SPORT, 2013, 1 (03) : 241 - 245
  • [49] Educational change from the perspective of decision makers
    Tedesco J.C.
    Prospects, 1997, 27 (4) : 533 - 540
  • [50] Coproduce Conservation Technology With Conservation Decision Makers and Practitioners to Increase Its Impact
    Malcom, Jacob W.
    Evans, Michael
    Norriss, Jessica
    Foster, Victoria
    Moskwik, Matthew
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2022, 2