Removing Barriers to Whistleblowing at Nonprofit Organizations through Employee Empowerment*

被引:1
|
作者
Arroyo, Paulina [1 ]
Smaili, Nadia [1 ]
Bensid, Souad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Natl Bank Canada, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
nonprofit organizations; fraud; whistleblowing; board of directors; empowerment; systems approach; SARBANES-OXLEY; FRAUD; GOVERNANCE; BEHAVIOR; DETERMINANTS; ADOPTION; CLIMATE; CODES;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3838.12332
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study explores how key organizational and governance actors perceive the effectiveness of whistleblowing at nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and how whistleblowing is interrelated with other anti-fraud mechanisms. Using a systems approach, we develop a conceptual framework of anti-fraud mechanisms consisting of a set of interrelated components: control-focused mechanisms and employee-focused mechanisms (whistleblowing) intended to prevent and detect fraud, influenced by the environment (regulation and stakeholders) and human factors (employees' attitudes and leaders' awareness of fraud). We conducted 14 semistructured interviews with key actors at Canadian NPOs and noted that diverse control mechanisms were in place at these groups, but seemingly no formal whistleblowing policy existed. The organizations were disinclined to formalize a whistleblowing system in the short term despite viewing such a system as effective. Whereas prior research has examined the role of control-focused mechanisms, NPOs' adoption of whistleblowing systems, and the benefits thereof, we contribute to the literature by stressing that employee empowerment is crucial to overcoming reluctance to blow the whistle. If the board of directors is aware of fraud risk and provides employees with the resources, motivation, and protection to speak up, whistleblowing could be implemented in these organizations. Whistleblowing should be interrelated with other mechanisms to form an effective anti-fraud system.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 300
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conceptual model of predicting employee performance through the mediating role of employee engagement and empowerment
    Al Zeer, Imad
    Ajouz, Mousa
    Salahat, Mahmoud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (05) : 986 - 1004
  • [32] Impact of employee and member empowerment on commitment in Korean sports organizations: A meta-analysis
    Bae, Jung-Sup
    Nam, Sang-Back
    Lee, Kwang-Yong
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2020, 48 (01):
  • [33] Barriers to empowerment: Assessment of community-led local development organizations in Pakistan
    Wahid, Abdul
    Ahmad, Muhammad Shakil
    Abu Talib, Noraini Bt.
    Shah, Iqtidar Ali
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Jan, Farzand Ali
    Saleem, Muhammad Qaiser
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 74 : 1361 - 1370
  • [34] The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations
    Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 41 (15) : 1302 - 1313
  • [35] The board of nonprofit organizations: Puzzling through the gaps between law and practice
    Brody, Evelyn
    FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2007, 76 (02) : 521 - 566
  • [37] EMPOWERMENT THROUGH CHOICE? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF CHOICE IN ORGANIZATIONS
    Chua, Roy Yong-Joo
    Yengar, Sheena S.
    RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 27, 2006, 27 : 41 - 79
  • [38] Decoding employee experiences during pandemic through online employee reviews: insights to organizations
    Joshi, Arun
    Sekar, Srinivasan
    Das, Saini
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2024, 53 (01) : 288 - 313
  • [39] Beyond the Social Mission: How Social Responsibility in Nonprofit Organizations May Stimulate Positive Employee Outcomes
    Kluijtmans, Tom
    Crucke, Saskia
    VOLUNTAS, 2024, 35 (04): : 780 - 791
  • [40] Motivators for and barriers against workplace flexibility: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and public sector organizations
    McNamara, Tay K.
    Brown, Melissa
    Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie
    COMMUNITY WORK & FAMILY, 2012, 15 (04) : 487 - 500