Mitigating Algorithmic Bias with Limited Annotations

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Guanchu [1 ]
Du, Mengnan [2 ]
Liu, Ninghao [3 ]
Zou, Na [4 ]
Hu, Xia [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] New Jersey Inst Technol, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Bias mitigation; Limitied annotation;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-43415-0_15
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Existing work on fairness modeling commonly assumes that sensitive attributes for all instances are fully available, which may not be true in many real-world applications due to the high cost of acquiring sensitive information. When sensitive attributes are not disclosed or available, it is needed to manually annotate a small part of the training data to mitigate bias. However, the skewed distribution across different sensitive groups preserves the skewness of the original dataset in the annotated subset, which leads to non-optimal bias mitigation. To tackle this challenge, we propose Active Penalization Of Discrimination (APOD), an interactive framework to guide the limited annotations towards maximally eliminating the effect of algorithmic bias. The proposed APOD integrates discrimination penalization with active instance selection to efficiently utilize the limited annotation budget, and it is theoretically proved to be capable of bounding the algorithmic bias. According to the evaluation on five benchmark datasets, APOD outperforms the state-of-the-arts baseline methods under the limited annotation budget, and shows comparable performance to fully annotated bias mitigation, which demonstrates that APOD could benefit real-world applications when sensitive information is limited. The source code of the proposed method is available at: https://github.com/guanchuwang/APOD-fairness.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 258
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mitigating algorithmic bias in opioid risk-score modeling to ensure equitable access to pain relief
    Atharva M. Bhagwat
    Kadija S. Ferryman
    Jason B. Gibbons
    Nature Medicine, 2023, 29 : 769 - 770
  • [22] Fighting algorithmic bias
    Photopoulos, Julianna
    PHYSICS WORLD, 2021, 34 (05) : 42 - 47
  • [23] Algorithmic Bias in Rankings
    Castillo, Carlos
    COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW 2019 ), 2019, : 741 - 741
  • [24] Battling Algorithmic Bias
    Kirkpatrick, Keith
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2016, 59 (10) : 16 - 17
  • [25] Mitigating algorithmic bias in opioid risk-score modeling to ensure equitable access to pain relief
    Bhagwat, Atharva M.
    Ferryman, Kadija S.
    Gibbons, Jason B.
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (04) : 769 - 770
  • [26] Mitigating algorithmic errors in a Hamiltonian simulation
    Endo, Suguru
    Zhao, Qi
    Li, Ying
    Benjamin, Simon
    Yuan, Xiao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (01)
  • [27] Assembled Bias: Beyond Transparent Algorithmic Bias
    Robyn Repko Waller
    Russell L. Waller
    Minds and Machines, 2022, 32 : 533 - 562
  • [28] Assembled Bias: Beyond Transparent Algorithmic Bias
    Waller, Robyn Repko
    Waller, Russell L.
    MINDS AND MACHINES, 2022, 32 (03) : 533 - 562
  • [29] Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization
    Bozdag, Engin
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 15 (03) : 209 - 227
  • [30] Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization
    Engin Bozdag
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2013, 15 : 209 - 227