Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy techniques in an in vitro stroke model: How to obtain a first pass recanalization?

被引:1
|
作者
Gregory, Gascou [1 ,3 ]
Federico, Cagnazzo [1 ]
Lefevre, Pierre -Henri [1 ]
Cyril, Dargazanli [1 ]
Vincent, Costalat [1 ]
Eker, Omer Faruk [2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Gui de Chauliac, Dept neuroradiol, Montpellier, France
[2] Hop Pierre Wertheimer, Dept neuroradiol, Bron, France
[3] Hop Gui de Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, Neuroradiol, Av Augustin Fl, Montpellier, France
关键词
Stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy; Stent retriever; Balloon guide catheter; In-vitro; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; BALLOON GUIDE CATHETER; STENT RETRIEVER; ASPIRATION; OCCLUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurad.2022.12.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has proven to be effective in the treatment of acute ische-mic stroke (AIS), significant research has been dedicated to establishing procedural techniques offering best rate of first pass effect (FPE). In this study, we compared the efficacy of different techniques in vitro to achieve the first pass recanalisation (FPR).Methods: In vitro MT procedures were performed using a realistic silicone model of the human cerebral vas-culature. The MT with stent retriever (SR) were performed with manual co-aspiration through the respective access catheter and intermediate catheter (IC), with Solumbra or partial retrieval techniques into the IC. Two SRs (Solitaire and EmboTrap) were selected to retrieve both red blood cells (RBC) rich and fibrin-rich clots. FPR rates were recorded for each case.Results: Overall, 144 MT were performed. FPR rates using the partial retrieval and Solumbra technique were of 100% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.01). The rate of FPR was of 92% using the balloon-guide catheter (BGC) compared to 64% with the guide catheter (GC) (p = 0.0001). With an IC, no differences were found between using a BGC or a GC (87.9% vs 89,6%, p = 0.75). No significant difference was observed between the Embotrap and the Solitaire device for the rate of FPR (82% and 74%, respectively; p = 0.23).Conclusions: In this study, FPR rates were higher with the use of an IC associated with the partial retrieval technique, regardless the guide catheter, the SR, or the clot composition. The less effective technique was the association of GC and SR, without an IC.& COPY; 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 443
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: a review of the different techniques
    Leung, V.
    Sastry, A.
    Srivastava, S.
    Wilcock, D.
    Parrott, A.
    Nayak, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 73 (05) : 428 - 438
  • [42] Thrombus Attenuation Gradient Can Predict Successful First-Pass Recanalization Following Stentriever Thrombectomy
    Kamepalli, Hari Kishore
    Kannath, Santhosh Kumar
    Sylaja, P. N.
    Rajan, Jayadevan Enakshy
    Chandrasekharan, Kesavadas
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 181 : E780 - E788
  • [43] Comparison of Recanalization Rate Between Intravenous Actilyse and Intravenous Actilyse With Mechanical Thrombectomy in Larger Artery Occlusion Ischemic Stroke Patients
    Im, Sanghyuk
    Yoo, Do-Sung
    Lee, MinHyung
    Cho, Byung-Rae
    Eun, Jin
    Ahn, JaeKun
    Park, Haekwan
    STROKE, 2020, 51
  • [44] Impact of obesity-related indicators on first-pass effect in patients with ischemic stroke receiving mechanical thrombectomy
    Zhang, Junliu
    Long, Ling
    Li, Jie
    Zhang, Heng
    Yan, Wei
    Abulimiti, Adilijiang
    Abulajiang, Nuerbiya
    Lu, Qingbo
    Nguyen, Thanh N.
    Cai, Xiaodong
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 66 (06) : 1021 - 1029
  • [45] Etiology of Stroke Based on Early Analysis of Clot Cytometry Obtained Through First Pass Technique for Mechanical Thrombectomy.
    Juega, Jesus
    Pagola, Jorge
    Palacio, Carlos
    Camacho, Jessica
    Cardona, Pere
    Quesada, Helena
    Dorado, Laura
    Hernandez, Maria
    De la Torre, Carolina
    Muchada, MArian
    Garcia-Tornel, Alvaro
    Rodriguez-Villatoro, Noelia
    Boned, Sandra
    Rodriguez-Luna, David
    Martinez, Elena
    Rubiera, Marta
    Ramon y Cajal Agueras, Santiago
    Ribo, Marc
    Tomasello, Alejandro
    Molina, Carlos
    STROKE, 2019, 50
  • [46] Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke How Distal Can We Go?
    Coutinho, Jonathan M.
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2016, 73 (11) : 1277 - 1278
  • [47] How to Revise Stroke Pathways after the Introduction of Mechanical Thrombectomy?
    Girot, M.
    REANIMATION, 2016, 25 (05): : 444 - 445
  • [48] A novel nomogram to predict futile recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy
    Lai, Cheng-cai
    Yao, Yin-dan
    Li, Xia
    Liu, Ao-fei
    Li, Chen
    Liu, Yun-e
    Jiang, Chang-chun
    Zhang, Ying-ying
    Jin, Min
    Lv, Jin
    Jiang, Wei-jian
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [49] How many stroke patients might be eligible for mechanical thrombectomy?
    El Tawil, Salwa
    Cheripelli, Bharath
    Huang, Xuya
    Moreton, Fiona
    Kalladka, Dheeraj
    MacDougal, Niall J. J.
    McVerry, Ferghal
    Muir, Keith W.
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2016, 1 (04) : 264 - 271
  • [50] Development of an in vitro model of calcified cerebral emboli in acute ischemic stroke for mechanical thrombectomy evaluation
    Johnson, Sarah
    McCarthy, Ray
    Fahy, Brian
    Mereuta, Oana Madalina
    Fitzgerald, Sean
    Gaudirc, Julien
    Remadi, Jean-Paul
    Shotar, Eimad
    Sourour, Nader-Antoine
    Doyle, Karen
    Gilvarry, Michael
    McGarry, Patrick
    McHugh, Peter E.
    Clarencon, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2020, 12 (10) : 1002 - 1007