Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of GaN Power Semiconductor Device

被引:6
|
作者
Vauche, Laura [1 ]
Guillemaud, Gabin [1 ]
Barbosa, Joao-Carlos Lopes [1 ]
Di Cioccio, Lea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, F-38000 Grenoble, France
关键词
GaN; power devices; environmental impact assessment; cradle-to-gate; life cycle assessment; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.3390/su16020901
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wide Band Gap (WBG) semiconductors have the potential to provide significant improvements in energy efficiency over conventional silicon (Si) semiconductors. While the potential for energy efficiency gains is widely researched, the relation to the energy and resource use during manufacturing processes remains insufficiently studied. In order to appraise the performance of the technology thoroughly, issues such as raw material scarcity, toxicity and environmental impacts need to be investigated in detail. However, sparse Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) data are available for the two currently most widespread WBG semiconductor materials, gallium nitride (GaN or GaN/Si) and silicon carbide (SiC). This paper, for the first time, presents a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment for a GaN/Si power device. To allow for a full range of indicators, life cycle assessment method EF 3.1 was used to analyze the results. The results identify environmental hotspots associated with different materials and processes: electricity consumption for the processes and clean room facilities, direct emissions of greenhouse gases, gold (when used), and volatile organic chemicals. Finally, we compare this result with publicly available data for Si, GaN and SiC power devices.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of ships: A case study of Panamax bulk carrier
    Dong Duc Tuan
    Wei, Cai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 233 (02) : 670 - 683
  • [22] Comparative environmental assessment of methanol production technologies: A cradle-to-gate life cycle analysis
    Liu, Jing
    Zhao, Jun
    Wei, Haiqiao
    Zhu, Qiang
    Li, Yang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 302
  • [23] Cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment of forest operations in Europe: environmental and energy profiles
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Mola-Yudego, Bias
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 66 : 188 - 198
  • [24] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of the dry etching step in the manufacturing of photovoltaic cells
    Andersen, Otto
    Gilpin, Geoffrey
    Andrae, Anders S. G.
    AIMS ENERGY, 2014, 2 (04) : 410 - 423
  • [25] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of Spirulina bioplastic produced via plasticization with glycerol
    Chalermthai, Bushra
    Nootong, Kasidit
    Olsen, Bradley D.
    Assabumrungrat, Suttichai
    Charoensuppanimit, Pongtorn
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 251
  • [26] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of a residential building in Sri Lanka
    Kumanayake, Ramya Priyangani
    Luo, Hanbin
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION OF SRI LANKA, 2018, 46 (03): : 355 - 367
  • [27] A cradle-to-gate assessment of environmental impacts for production of mustard oil using life cycle assessment approach
    Khatri, Poonam
    Jain, Suresh
    Pandey, Suneel
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 988 - 997
  • [28] LCA and economic cradle-to-gate analysis on the reuse of a temporary building
    Katebi, Ali
    Eghdam, Hadi Hosseinkhah
    Asadollahfardi, Gholamreza
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (49) : 59087 - 59102
  • [29] Comparative analysis of cement-based bricks in India: a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment
    Sravani, Tata
    Ramani, Prasanna Venkatesan
    Anbu, Madhumathi
    ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPRESS, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [30] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of structural bio-adhesives derived from glycerol
    Yang, Minliang
    Rosentrater, Kurt A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (04): : 799 - 806