Shame and blame: Secondary stigma among families of convicted sex offenders

被引:20
|
作者
Evans, Douglas [1 ]
Trahan, Adam [2 ]
Laird, Kaleigh [3 ]
机构
[1] Fairleigh Dickinson Univ, Criminol & Criminal Justice, Teaneck, NJ 07666 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Criminal Justice, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Penn, Criminol & Criminal Justice Program, Indiana, PA 15705 USA
关键词
Criminal justice contact; family members; incarceration; secondary stigma; sex offender; CHILDREN; EXPERIENCES; COLUMBINE; COMMUNITY; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1177/17488958211017391
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The detriment of incarceration experienced by the formerly incarcerated has been increasingly explored in the literature on reentry. A tangential but equally concerning issue that has recently received more research attention is the effect on family members of the incarcerated. The stigma of a criminal conviction is most apparent among families of convicted sex offenders, who experience consequences parallel to those of their convicted relative. Drawing from interviews with 30 individuals with a family member incarcerated for a sex offence in the United States, this study explores manifestations of stigma due to familial association. The findings suggest that families face negative treatment from social networks and criminal justice officials, engage in self-blame and that the media's control over the narrative exacerbates family members' experiences. Given the pervasiveness of criminal justice system contact, the rapid growth of the sex offender registry in the United States, and the millions of family members peripherally affected by one or both, justice system reforms are needed to ensure that family members are shielded from the harms of incarceration and registration.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 97
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Residency restrictions for convicted sex offenders - State law imposing residency restrictions for convicted sex offenders is not unconstitutional, given their presumed dangerousness
    Noroian, Paul
    Saleh, Fabian M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2006, 34 (03): : 422 - 425
  • [12] Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders
    Pogarsky, Greg
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 23 (01) : 59 - 74
  • [13] Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders
    Greg Pogarsky
    Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2007, 23 : 59 - 74
  • [14] Sex Offenders, Stigma, and Social Control
    Hoppe, Trevor
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2017, 46 (05) : 598 - 599
  • [15] Sex Offenders, Stigma, and Social Control
    Sumerau, J. E.
    SYMBOLIC INTERACTION, 2018, 41 (01) : 139 - 140
  • [16] RECIDIVISM AMONG CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS - A 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY
    ROMERO, JJ
    WILLIAMS, LM
    FEDERAL PROBATION, 1985, 49 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [17] FOURTH AMENDMENT CONSTRAINTS ON THE TECHNOLOGICAL MONITORING OF CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS
    McJunkin, Ben A.
    Prescott, J. J.
    NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2018, 21 (03): : 379 - 425
  • [18] CHEMICAL CASTRATION ON CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS: ON A VOLUNTARY OR COMPULSORY BASIS?
    Pastorini, Antonella
    Mazzariol, Brenno
    di Luca, Alessandro
    Abstract, Natale Mario di Luca
    MEDICINE AND LAW, 2020, 39 (04): : 645 - 663
  • [19] Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study
    Chapple, A
    Ziebland, S
    McPherson, A
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7454): : 1470 - 1473
  • [20] PSYCHIATRIC AND PSYCHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS - A SUMMARY REPORT
    BRANCALE, R
    ELLIS, A
    DOORBAR, RR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1952, 109 (01): : 17 - 21