A public sector financial management maturity model for developing countries: the case of Iran

被引:0
|
作者
Rahmani, Ali [1 ]
Behbahaninia, Parisa Saadat [1 ,2 ]
Parsaei, Mona [1 ]
Mahmoudkhani, Mahnaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Alzahra Univ, Tehran, Iran
[2] Alzahra Univ, Fac Social Sci & Econ, Dept Accounting, Tehran, Iran
关键词
financial management; maturity model; public sector; RISK-MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; SYSTEMS; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/00208523231195707
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Maturity models (MMs) are used as a reference framework in various fields. In the public sector (PS), the principles of good governance have necessitated an evolution in financial reporting. This study aimed to design a model of accounting and financial maturity for PS reporting units. This study has a mixed-methods design. The initial MM was designed using a systematic review and expert panel discussions. Then, five focus group interviews were held over seven sessions. Next, a questionnaire was distributed among Iranian PS experts to validate the components of the MM. Thirty-two people filled out the questionnaire. A binomial test was used to validate the dimensions of the model. The outcome of this study was the design of a MM for accounting and financial reporting in PS units. The model was designed in five levels and includes eight dimensions, namely leadership, budgeting and financial planning, financial leadership and supervision, efficiency and effectiveness, rules and regulations, financial reporting, human capital and information technology. This model can be used as a basis for assessing the performance of PS units and to implement good governance in organizations. This model is applicable to all developing countries that utilize the revised International PS Accounting Standards and seek to establish a new PS management approach and performance-based budgeting.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 598
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public Sector Financial Support for SME Innovativeness: Case Study of Selected CEE countries
    Gyamfi, Solomon
    Anderson, Henry, Jr.
    Stejskal, Jan
    CURRENT TRENDS IN PUBLIC SECTOR RESEARCH, 2019, : 84 - 91
  • [32] Special Issue: Beyond Conventional Public Sector Management Reforms in Developing Countries Preface
    Brinkerhoff, Derick W.
    Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) : 221 - 221
  • [33] Data management maturity assessment of public sector agencies
    Thomas, Manoj A.
    Cipolla, Joseph
    Lambert, Bob
    Carter, Lemuria
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (04)
  • [34] IP Management in the Context of Developing Countries - The Case of Iran's Industrial Companies
    Ghazinoory, Sepehr
    Abedi, Sadegh
    Bagheri, Seyed Kamran
    Adibi, Mahyar
    IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2012, 43 (03) : 267 - 285
  • [35] Public Sector Efficiency and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
    Trabelsi, Nahed
    Boujelbene, Younes
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 596 - 615
  • [36] Public sector reforms in developing countries: A preliminary review
    Knox, Colin
    Sharipova, Dina
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 43 (05) : 368 - 380
  • [37] Public preferences towards bicycle sharing system in developing countries: The case of Mashhad, Iran
    Abolhassani, Leili
    Afghari, Amir Pooyan
    Borzadaran, Hamideh Mohtashami
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 : 763 - 773
  • [38] Analysis of economic and financial structure of the electricity sector in developing countries
    Sohtaoglu, NH
    POWERCON '98: 1998 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 956 - 960
  • [39] Bilateral and multilateral financial assistance for the energy sector of developing countries
    Tirpaki, Dennis
    Adams, Helen
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 (02) : 135 - 151
  • [40] ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTS IN PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
    Vasicek, Davor
    CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 9 (02): : 393 - 420